2007-05-20 15:37:57 · 17 answers · asked by Luv2no is in the house 7 in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Fishing
I release most but I keep a few to eat every month or so , I like to keep fish from places that are overpopulated with them like my lake here
its been about a month so I may just go out back and catch a few tonight to keep
my last fish dinner
http://i13.tinypic.com/54megqc.jpg
2007-05-20 16:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by Brandon 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I only eat the fish I catch when I go to the bay and catch stripers. All other times I just fish catch and release.
2007-05-21 03:43:36 · answer #2 · answered by FF ENG9INE 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you don't eat the fish then why bother fishing? I never understood that. To me fishing is not a sport, it's a hobby for people that like to eat fish.
I mean I see that there are some fish that you don't like and throw back, but I know some people throw everything back in. I keep what I want to eat.
2007-05-20 15:43:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
catch and release all the way. if you want to eat fish go to long john silvers
2007-05-21 05:39:38 · answer #4 · answered by onemocc 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
my family always eats what we catch but only if the fish is big.
2007-05-20 15:43:26 · answer #5 · answered by Matt 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm mainly "catch & release". I just like the sport of catching them and reeling them in. Besides, a good fisherman doesn't keep what he doesn't intend to eat.
2007-05-21 02:28:51 · answer #6 · answered by bubbabear 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I will eat most the good sized trout that I catch. I will release most the bass I catch so others can catch them. I clean alot of my catfish too.
2007-05-20 15:44:26 · answer #7 · answered by America's Team is back!!! 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I pratice catch and release, but if i foul hook it or i know the fish are safe to eat, i will keep them only if its legal ( slot limits, seasonal restrictions)
2007-05-20 18:22:22 · answer #8 · answered by jim_cree1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I keep what i catch. Even though fishing is fun, its also a free meal. Nothing beats FREE!
2007-05-20 15:55:00 · answer #9 · answered by russian bandit 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're arising a difficulty that could ok no longer even exist. How could desire to a minimum of one ask the style of question that maximum probable could no longer probable be genuine? An island that includes no flowers? it is likewise risky to devour uncooked fish, and if there have been no flowers or trees, how could desire to a minimum of one even attempt to start a fireplace to cook dinner the fish? you may no longer ask a stupid obscure question without taking each and everything into attention. apparently you attempt to get vegetarians/vegans to admit they could devour the fish, and in turn, you may element your finger and get in touch with them hypocrites. How could understanding the respond income your existence in any way,shape or style?
2016-12-11 15:25:29 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋