English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Any book(s) you just don't think ought to be in the Bible for some reason? Hypothetically, if it were up to you?

For me it would be Ezra-Nehemiah. I think the narratives are important, but the spiritual lessons are HORRIBLE...

(And before you bother to answer "None, they're all inspired, etc." Stop and think... Why did your Bible omit some books? All protestant Bibles omit some books; every Bible ultimately has only some books included while other ancient texts that could have been included weren't. Someone made that choice; have you ever stopped to think why and how those choices were made in the first place?)

Remember, I'm just talking hypothetically! What book(s) do you PERSONALLY have a hard time with?

2007-05-20 15:37:40 · 22 answers · asked by dreamed1 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

22 answers

If I had to, Id take out esther, or Obadiah. There isnt much in either.

2007-05-20 15:49:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

someone said "martin Luther already did that". As far as I know he didn't have any removed. He did wish the book of James was not in the bible and that is one I would (hypothetically) remove because it seems to contradict Paul regarding faith and works.

2007-05-20 22:53:56 · answer #2 · answered by expertless 5 · 1 0

Remove: Paul's epistles, & Revelations.
Add: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene & of Thomas

2007-05-20 22:48:04 · answer #3 · answered by DCFN 4 · 1 0

of the 66 books that have stood the test of time and scrutiny, I would have to say






























NOT A SINGLE ONE!
please read 2 Timothy 3:16

agape!

.

2007-05-20 22:59:32 · answer #4 · answered by seeker 3 · 0 0

Song of Soloman is not an inspired book

2007-05-20 22:51:06 · answer #5 · answered by Radioactive Dreams 2 · 0 0

Martin Luther already did that for the Protestants.

2007-05-20 22:40:45 · answer #6 · answered by tebone0315 7 · 2 0

I would rather add some back in, but I consider the Bible to be just a book (anthology, really) and not an inerrant source of wisdom.

2007-05-20 22:41:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Song of Solomon. Someone said they'd take out Isaiah, but that has extremely important prophecy in it. Job has a good lesson to it.

2007-05-20 22:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by Iamnotarobot (former believer) 6 · 1 2

Remove, books about dreamed1.. That's you what I meant.
Kidding2

I have a hard time to read about exodus to numbers.

It doesn't mean that I don't like them. y know..

2007-05-20 22:44:35 · answer #9 · answered by NML 2 · 1 0

I would remove all the false words that man has written in the Bible. The Bible has been changed/edited so many times that most of it isn't even God's word anymore, it's mans

2007-05-20 22:42:55 · answer #10 · answered by ¸.•*´`*•.¸ ℓανєη∂єr ¸.•*´`*•.¸ 6 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers