Doesn't the Big Bang Theory disprove the Genesis account of creation?

Question

LOL none of you have heard of the Red Shift?

The Red Shift prove the Big Bang.

And the Big Bang is not a "theory" it's an explanation that has been scientifically proven.


And the fact of Evolution is not a theory.

Answer 1

Yes. It does! When I was in school we learned both creationism and evolution. Now days they are only allowed to teach Evolution.

Answer 2

I think the human mind is terribly limited when it comes to creation.
The reason being is there can always be something left out of the equation.
If god is the creator of all things I mean all
physical things including all the physics of
distance of all the particals in the space we
share.
Wouldnt the void itself be the first thing to
create?
An artist starts with a blank canvis and it has to be special to hold the paint, the canvis is the most imoptant part of every picture.
Wouldnt the void be the most complex of
all his creation so that all that cycles within
it will support life?

Was the void created or is it the creator
himself?

The big bang theory is a possible process
for our existence and can go along with the
Genisis account or it can be disproved.
There are a lot of folks just trying to justify
there own actions in life by not believing a
god exists by basing there beliefs on things
they can only comprehend to gain acceptance of the masses.

Answer 3

I wouldn't think so. God created things according to his plan, whatever that was, and we have a very limited account of what he did to do that.

Evolution would be closer to messing with the account, but that is not the Big Bang.

What I do see that we have is the traditional translation to guide us to understand that the Earth was made in a week. I would translate it differently, and so the Gap Theory of Genesis 1:1 - 1:2 is what I lean on for accuracy. Not because I want to comform to the Big Bang or the Theory of Evolution, but that I would conform to God's word.

Answer 4

The Genesis account of creation is not a scientific theory as to the begining of the universe----it is a theological understanding of mans relationship to God and the earth. The two are completely different things.....

Answer 5

Not really. The big bang Theory says there was nothing. Then there was. The Bible says as I recall "The world was empty and with out light, The Lord said let there be light and there was" It is that simple, thus the Big Bang. What is the problem?

Answer 6

The Big Bang has its own problems too. Questions scientists have not been able to answer are: Where did the ball of burning gas come from? Why did it explode? How did the first hydrogen atoms begin nuclear fussion without other elements? How did they come to form galaxies? What did the atoms have to do with the creation of gravity?

Put down the Catechism and pick up the Bible.

Answer 7

Genesis, God said let there be light, then he flipped the switch and creation came on. Big Bang, in the beginning there was nothing, then it exploded. Either way I'm here so its all good.

Answer 8

It conflicts with the Genesis account on many levels, but the theory isn't exactly fact at this point, so I say the Jury is still out.

Answer 9

The Big Bang Theory agrees with the Koran. The Bible has many flaws.

Answer 10

No. It says that God said the word and the universe was here. It never says "how" he did it. I think God could have been the root of the Big Bang. But no one knows for sure.

Answer 11

well, as it's just a theory..it doesn't really prove much of anything.

But creationism has many more flaws than the big bang might.