Offensively, both are (were) pretty much one tool guys, moderate at best defense, and they have (had) incredible power for their size.
2007-05-20 12:50:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Boxing
What similarities? Hamed is trash to begin with manny is the real thing.
2007-05-21 18:24:43 · answer #1 · answered by say_what!!! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no comparison really. Hamed was nothing but a cocky overrated fighter who ducked the top fighters in the featherweight division, particularly Luisito Espinosa, whom he was scared to fight. Hamed was fast and quick but Pacman is faster and quicker and definitely much more powerful. Moreover, Pacman has tons of courage and fighting heart, and unlike Hamed, he's willing to take on all comers and challengers. Had they fought, Pacman would've knocked the Prince inside 5.
2007-05-20 20:50:30 · answer #2 · answered by bundini 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing I agree on about that is that they both got a great punch. Manny has more heart, a better defense, better jab, better everything basically, oh yeah Hamed does speak better english, but thats about it. If you don't agree with my answer, just watch Barrera vs Hamed, and Barrea vs Pacquiao, you'll see.
2007-05-20 14:28:43 · answer #3 · answered by RicktheReckless 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not really. Hamed was a sham artist. Hamed's first real rated fighter was MAB, who hammered him. Up to that, he fought tomato cans who were part time dishwashers.
2007-05-20 14:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by kieran27 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you let them fight in the prime of hamed, hamed is the better fighter than pacquiao
2007-05-21 23:51:11 · answer #5 · answered by party_rt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I too wanted to ask the same question.
2007-05-20 20:04:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋