Is there any scientific evidence that contradicts the theory of evolution?

Answer 1

“To debunk the theory of evolution by means of scientific evidence is without a doubt acceptable, however disproving it using creationism is absurd since it requires science to prove evolution, it also requires science to disprove it.”

Answer 2

well, I think it's pretty much a fact that evolution has occurred. what is not quite so concrete is the exact hows and whatnot. And if God is the issue here, evolution being fact doesnt rule out the role of God, just the traditional and literal interpretation. A compromise of sorts would be called theistic evolution.
Another interesting thing to think about (I'm not very good at science, but I'll give it to you as well as I can phase it) is the original spark of life for a living organism. It's all well to believe in the big bang and this version of the creation of the universe as well as evolution occurring, but where exactly did the leap from inanimate matter to living tissue occur? As far as I know (someone correct me if I'm wrong, because I'd like to know) there's no real scientifically proven theory on how the first organism came from.

Answer 3

There is a really big problem with this question. Usually people who propose it want evidence that disproves Darwinism. There is scientific evidence that argues argainst Darwinism, but it only proposes another evolutionary theory.
Why can't people give it a rest. The purpose of science is to try to explain natural phenomena. Religion tries to help man to develop a personal relationship with God. An explanation of the way things are does not disprove the existence of God any more than digitizing a Van Gogh painting and making posters produces art.

Answer 4

Evolution is not a science Evolution defies mathematical probability. Evolution defies laws of physics (second law of thermodynamics.)

Successful production of a 200-component functioning organism requires at least 200 beneficial mutations. The odds of getting that many successive beneficial mutations is
r to the power 200, where r is the rate of beneficial mutations. Even if r is 0.5 (and it is really much smaller), that makes the odds worse than 1 in 10 to the power 60, which is impossibly small.

Science does not claim a 10 billion year history of the world. Such a claim is beyond its scope. It only claims that, if we assume that the present laws of nature were always in force, then the world is that old.

We have still yet to see any evidence of one species becoming another. Variations in the same species doesn't equate to evolution. For all we know at this stage is that those variations are preprogrammed in the DNA as possible variations. Mixing of DNA may make a new type of dog, but it is still a dog. So, even if a complex single cell organism managed to spontaneously form with perfect parts one time or even a thousand times, it wouldn't account for the wonderful variety of life here on Earth

Answer 5

First, clarify origins. there have been no fossils till there have been creatures to fossilize. of path you will could exercising your faith to have self belief that non-residing remember suddenly won intelligence and jumped to existence. Then to have self belief that those creatures defied all organic regulations and progressed into thoroughly diverse species is a extensive bounce of religion. Your mountain of knowledge genuinely quantities to a molehill of fabrication. And the fossil checklist is an entire embarrassment to evolution believers. somewhat medical data may be effectual yet shall we face it, there is none.

Answer 6

Plenty. Just really study it and find out. I bet if Darwin came back and found out what a fuss he caused just by saying monkeys look like humans and their difference is 3%, he would probably regret it. He probably didn't think them liberals would make such a big deal about it.

Answer 7

I find it rather interesting that those who feel that life is far too complex to have evolved spontaneously readily accept the idea that whatever designed it did

Answer 8

No. None that has any basis in science or has been put forth by reputable and recognized scientists.

Answer 9

no, zero non. it is the law of evolution. your grand-monther was a fish-bird and your mother was a monkey and now you are you. this has been well-established through years of unscientific experiments. don't even question evolution. never! you're a fool if you dont believe like everyone else.

Answer 10

None. Absolutely none.