English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why can't there be a formula for religious studies/exercises? (Like church and religion?) I mean, it seems to work for the most part, yet so many people refer to dogma and religious practices with derision and have no respect for them.

*yeah, I know I know, a conditional question. I couldn't help it. It's been on my mind today, so I hope you'll bear with me and not think any worse of me for putting it up. Thanks for your responses. Tell me how dogma and ritual makes you feel.

2007-05-20 08:54:42 · 8 answers · asked by Shinigami 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

(in light of the above premise)

2007-05-20 08:56:52 · update #1

8 answers

Yes, Story Junkie, there is a formula for Christianity:

You see, God is a mathematician and has left us some formulas that display the entire timing of earth's part in a galactic drama.

Won't go into it too much here, but http://abiblecode.tripod.com gives greater detail.

First of all, the whole Bible is a code book. There are literal prophecies, like Bethlehem would have the honor of introducing the Messiah--written about 700 years before the event.

Then there are symbolic prophecies, like the Passover Lamb's blood saving the Egyptians fulfilled on that fateful Friday when the real Passover lamb was slain.

Then, let me call some drama prophecies. The Bible doesn't say why they are there, but when an event fulfills, you know it was part of God's plan. Take for example the silly story of God creating Adam's bride through the wound in His side. No Orthodox Jew can figure that out, but Christians who look at Jesus' pierced side realize the plan of salvation was drawn up before Earth was created.

Then, there are mathematical prophecies. The one at the link above will tell you more than you could have guessed, and the Bible says: "The wise shall understand."

Each one of those types are a formula in themselves and would require more study than you would give them in a classroom setting.

Take care, and Blessings in Jesus, One-Way

2007-05-20 09:11:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

In physics and chemistry, things can be empirically demonstrated or disproved. This leads to a broad consensus on things like the law of gravity or the polymerase chain reaction. In literature and religion, on the other hand, both the principles and the results are subjective and largely matters of personal opinion. Thus questions such as the proper interpretation of Apocalypse or the literary merits of The DaVinci Code will always be contentious.

2007-05-20 16:25:36 · answer #2 · answered by injanier 7 · 0 0

My son, how have you been so blind? As there is formula for science and literature, there are such for statecraft and the cultivation of a religious orthodoxy. They are well established to such an extent that a certain well educated science fiction writer was able to create Dianetics, then Scientology.

I believe the subjects are theology and political science. Researching large cults is an excellent way to learn exactly how religion can happen, especially on a small scale.

2007-05-20 16:11:22 · answer #3 · answered by eine kleine nukedmusik 6 · 0 0

Dogma, ritual, and tradition are the earmarks of man's impact on religion. Mostly they have little or nothing to do with building relationship between God and His creation. Christ wants us to have relationship with the Father through Him. He wants us to come to Him as a child would approach a loving parent, with childlike trust and openness, confidence, a pure heart, and love. Forget man made dogma and empty repetitive religiosity's. Develop a relationship of the heart with Jesus.

2007-05-20 16:09:09 · answer #4 · answered by rico3151 6 · 0 0

I'm against dogma of any kind, but if you want to write well, I suggest you check out William Goldman's book on screen writing. It's the only one I could think of off-hand. Also have a look at what Writer's Digest has on tap.

2007-05-20 15:59:24 · answer #5 · answered by SieglindeDieNibelunge 5 · 0 0

You're comparing apples and oranges. Chemistry and physics can be supported by empirical evidence, mathematical formulas are known to be factual. Religion is totally different- it's based on revelations, sentiment and subjective judgements.

2007-05-20 16:04:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because math is proven, chemistry is proven, religion is all faith, there is nothing concrete to grasp, and in this case there is no way to prove to someone else you are right, this is the basis of faith.

everyone has a different idea on it because there is no way to prove it.

2007-05-20 15:58:18 · answer #7 · answered by Drew W 2 · 2 0

god never left one

2007-05-20 15:57:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers