overly religious
2007-05-20 07:29:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
If Religious is to believe in something and Agnostic is to believe in nothing, then I say, it's better to believe in something. It will give your life meaning and purpose. To believe in nothing is to accept a life of pointlessness.
.
2007-05-20 23:19:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Twoeyes 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Religious.
2007-05-20 14:30:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by S K 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Agnostics don't go around trying to convert anybody to their way of thinking.
2007-05-20 14:35:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is worse to be agnostic. Sinmply because if God is real like the Holy Bible which is the only infallable word of God says he is, then anyone who does not believe is going to spend all eternity tormented in Hell. IT's better to be considered a Jesus Freak than to be considered cool and agnostic and spend all eternity in HELL.
2007-05-20 14:37:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Marie 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
Dogmatic.
2007-05-20 14:31:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paien 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religious is FAR worse.
You don't see me trying to force my opinions on you through our laws or even a fear of an imaginary hell.
2007-05-20 14:35:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think agnosticism is a plausible attitude towards the problem of spirituality. religion is not.
2007-05-20 14:40:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question is worst than them, just take a look at answers.
2007-05-20 14:33:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pretty Girl 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
agnostics dont believe there is something. they believe there is no way to prove existance or inexistance.
2007-05-20 14:31:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Abaddon 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
To believe or not to believe....is definitely the right question.
If you are a believer, then it is worse to not believe in a god.
If you are a non-believer, then it is worse to be misled by someone who is not there.
It really depends on your standpoint.
2007-05-20 14:32:16
·
answer #11
·
answered by liz 2
·
2⤊
1⤋