English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

everyone says that it would be catastrophic.but im not so sure...can you imagine how many jobs ot would create o rebuild mexico? we would have a economic growth similar to india or china.one no first world country sees anymore..100 million mexicans are more an opportunity than a threat....I think...can you imagine al those poeple with decent salaries spending money? the US economy, I think would thrive.....save it from the inevetible fact that china will take over as world super power....because it doesnt matter that there people are poor.....europeans are rich and that doesnt make europe a superopower....i think it would actually revitalize the economy,,,

2007-05-19 22:45:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

is there any economist out there willing to answer?

2007-05-19 22:58:25 · update #1

umm lisa..are you dumb or something.hello there wouldnt be any illegal mexicans anymore..everyone would get a decent wage...sso if you loose your job it would be because youre less competitive not because they would earn less...get it?

2007-05-19 23:01:22 · update #2

TM what makes you say that?

2007-05-19 23:10:04 · update #3

16 answers

What use would that be, you already have a free trade zone, just intensify the contacts within NAFTA if you want this. There's absolutely no need for Canada and Mexico to give up their sovereignty and identity. As this obviously wouldn't be a merger but more of a US American take over.

2007-05-19 23:52:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I am not an economist but I am a CPA.

Canada wants no part of our problems and while they are not perfect by any means they still have much less problems than we have and Mexico would have to be destroyed and then rebuilt, have you got that much money to spend?

We need to find a way to help fix Mexico from a distance and the people who are flooding across our borders need to fight too, they have absolutely no problems demanding from us here in the US, if they takes those demands home they may actually force a change.

By the way China IS a super power, and we are their number 1 importer of goods - WalMart ring a bell? China depends on importing its goods and service in order to make it and Europe is not a superpower because they are rich but it doesn't hurt.

Miguel: If they are claiming just their supposed land why are they in Virginia and NC?

2007-05-19 23:58:39 · answer #2 · answered by M B 5 · 2 0

Not much, from a governmental standpoint. All three countries have different styles of government, and the fundamental styles would clash. There is, of course, a potentially viable movement to merge countries in the form of a union, similar to the EU. It's referred to as the North American Union, or NAU. The following link, from Wikipedia, is not necessarily the most trustworthy, I think (because Wikipedia isn't the final word in many aspects), but it does have some fundamental information about such a union. By the way: Personally, I don't and wouldn't support such a union, because I think it would be disastrous for all three countries (except for the very wealthy and the very poor, who would be the only ones to benefit).

2016-05-21 23:20:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would be out of a job. Again.
Mexicans keep business paying low wages. There's already too many people out of work because Mexicans do the work cheap. High School students have it worst. They cant get job experience because highly experienced Mexican burger flippers take over all the fast food restaurants. They take all the low skill jobs.
I like Mexicans personally, I just dont like them taking our jobs.

2007-05-19 22:58:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

And who would foot the bill for all of these new millions of poor people while we are negotiating to rebuild Mexico? I think this plan is in the works but I think it will destroy America. Which is on it's way down anyway, it will just make it happen faster.

2007-05-19 22:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 6 0

Another Okay idea to fix a large scale problem. I think if we some how merged multiple ideas together we could come up with a better solution than the present Amnesty bill.


In the mean time why don't you just ask them to leave?
http://www.dearillegalmexicans.com
Is it so hard to talk to them directly? We have to talk to our fearless leaders who have to some how include them as if they have say when the break the law.

2007-05-20 01:18:55 · answer #6 · answered by Placido 3 · 0 0

Wow, what goofy ideas. I think you think too much. I am sure you cannot predict the future. We cannot protect our borders now. How would we possibly hold out illegals with 160,000 miles of sea shore to guard? Anyone with a boat would be able to get into the US/mex/can. So our illegal population problem could go to 200 million. Crazy muslims could put a fifty pound dirty bomb in a canoe, travel up the Saint Lawrence river and detonate next to Cleveland. Would you want to be responsible for contaminating two million people? I don't think so. Anyone with a twisted imagination can think up cockamamie scenarios.

2007-05-19 23:51:41 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2 2

I could see the U.S.A. and Canada...becoming something substantial and feasible! But I don't think Mexico will go over in the mix too well????? But on the other hand...We'de have great Pit Barbeques,Tortilla's and really good Labatt's and Molson's Beer

2007-05-19 22:53:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

No. NO. Canadians stay in Canada. Mexicans stay in Mexico. Except for legal immigrants. We're fine, we do NOT need to 'merge' with anyone.

2007-05-19 23:38:45 · answer #9 · answered by tttplttttt 5 · 3 0

Our schools are already failing from all of the illegal immigrants' children from Mexico, above our limits for immigration. They don't have universal free education through high school there. As a parent there who can't afford private school, what exactly would you do?

Do you want ALL of our schools like LAUSD?

Our children's education is their future, and their children are NOT more important than our own.

2007-05-20 01:13:19 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers