I think this one is:
A thing that doesn't exist must be hated by God. If God doesn't exist, he would have to hate himself, that is just obviously nonsense, right?
2007-05-19 19:02:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"you watch pro wrestling alot don't you."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, that is so f*cking funny I'm farting right now
2007-05-19 19:08:10 · update #1
Why must the Bible God, eh? Am I talking about America here? No I am not
2007-05-19 19:10:17 · update #2
Bad grammar? Who are you responding to, Britney Spears?
2007-05-19 19:33:37 · update #3
Wow, you just converted me to Christianity!
Oh wait, that's right... no you didn't because YOU CAN'T HATE SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXIST!
2007-05-19 19:09:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
In technological information type, technological information ought to study. between the scientists who take care of the concern, there is not any controversy. Evolution is technological information, creationism isn't. despite if, the authentic subject is that evolution itself isn't given adequate time in the college room. including nonsense to the curriculum will basically soak up greater of the scarce time. besides, what might study if creationism is secure? What the creationists say, and devoid of examination? Creationism is in accordance with falsehoods and nonsense. The creationists might easily merchandise if their arguments are heavily analyzed in the class, yet their falsehoods should not be unanswered. in the event that they weren't heavily analyzed, the scholars could be perplexed and finally end up with an erroneous comprehend-how of what technological information is.
2016-12-29 14:53:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Note: I neither believe nor disbelieve God, I just ignore the idea so I can be away from this non-stopping feud between believers and non believers.
This is a fact: You can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God. You cannot prove that God does not exist becuase this is beyond the realm of human reasoning and scientific applications. You cannot say that God exist because of the Bible since man wrote it. Since man can lie, the Bible is falliable.
Now, since this argument is obviously going nowhere, why don't just drop the subject and be friends.
2007-05-19 19:09:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yo - teejay - it's monkeys. The Monkees were a crappy 60's tv band. Get it right. Monkees, indeed.
As to the question. What the hell are you on? That makes no sense. That's not a strong argument at all. Where did you come up with this gem?
2007-05-19 19:16:31 · answer #4 · answered by ReeRee 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That wouldn't be a legitimate argument for a non-believer, because they don't believe in God, therefore they don't believe he would be capable of hating himself.
My favorite argument is based on the logic and facts they tend to favor so much. Fact: nobody knows the origin of their existence, except that one day they popped into this life. They can't speak to anything else being a fact about the nature of their existence, because they weren't there to see it (which is a requirement for fact-finders).
So popping into this life out of nowhere has to be pretty miraculous. Any other beliefs they have about their origins would just be a matter of faith.
2007-05-19 19:08:24 · answer #5 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This is the sort of argument that Bertrand Russell would have dismissed as a case of bad grammar. You can't just reason something into existence like that!
If that's your strongest argument, i don't understand why *you're* not a non-believer .
'Scuse me, i need a drink...
2007-05-19 19:17:32 · answer #6 · answered by RickySTT, EAC 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Birth of a Child. Ask a father of the child, who is a non believer, whether this is a natural phenomenon or a miracle of God.
www.askahindu.com
2007-05-19 19:14:02 · answer #7 · answered by Vijay Ojha 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The logic is ok, but there's no reason your first premise has to be true. Does god hate unicorns? Why?
And why do you have to prove god exists to people who don't believe anyways?
2007-05-19 19:06:48 · answer #8 · answered by Clawndike 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think it's the First Cause/Cosmological Argument. Everything has a cause. Every cause has a cause. Track that back to the first cause and you see that the first thing to cause something else must have had a cause. Read St. Thomas Aquinas's arguments.
2007-05-19 19:07:39 · answer #9 · answered by Atticus Finch 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
The example you gave stinks! Who says that God hates things that dont exists? By definition, something that doesnt exist.....doesnt exist! It somewhat circular.
2007-05-19 19:06:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋