English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok so Adam and Eve had kids. Who did the kids have sex with to make more kids? The only answer is either with eachother or with the parents...

Is this why we only use 10 percent of our brains and that all these incestuous acts have resulted in us being "slower" than we should be?

2007-05-19 18:52:52 · 14 answers · asked by MrBubba69 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

it's not perfect human thing or corrupt dna thing, but adam and eve were so genetically varied that no 2 kids had similar genes. so they could intermarry w/in their brothers and sisters and their children be fine.

it's just like dogs. if u take 2 mutts that are both mixes of say, 10 breeds, you wont have problems until you narrow them back down generations later into breeds. that's why mutts can have healthy puppies, but when u start breeding pure breds you start having genetic disorders. My dad had a chihuahua who was so inbred her hips would pop out of joint just by looking at her.

So genetically having your children do each other would be healthy and not put your grandchildren at risk of horrible afflicting disorders if your genetics were diverse enough.

and God didn't say not to do your sister or brother until leviticus.

2007-05-19 19:22:23 · answer #1 · answered by Casey 3 · 0 0

After analyzing your question I went to confirm if the term have been replaced from psychological retardation to psychological disabilities, yet could not locate info of it. in keeping with risk i did not look in the dazzling section. at the instant the state i'm living in acknowledges psychological retardation in keeping with state policies and regs for certification applications. different states use the term psychological disabilities and such however the critierion is an analogous, heavily not on time cognitive skills and heavily not on time adaptive skills. There are some rule out activities in contact purely before certification and it extremely is needed that a qualified professional render the certification, yet appropriate now it sounds like psychological retardation is the dazzling term in multiple states. psychological Retardation is a analysis or certification, it would not tell all people how loving the new child is, his or her abilities, features or hopes and targets. don't get too caught up in the words, they are automobiles for investment and information. concentration much less on the words and extra on the new child. comprehend it for what's. in my view, i could particularly comprehend what the words advise. I even have considered mum and dad from different states flow in with labels like mentally challenged or mentally disabled and it extremely is extremely confusing for them to pay attention the words mentally retarded. frequently cases they sense duped via the people who had used the words mentally disabled etc. Love the new child for who they are, help them progression and concentration on procuring as many skills for autonomous residing as attainable. That seems maximum severe to me.

2016-10-05 10:02:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The diagnostic label of Mental Retardation is typically applied to those whose IQ's are 65, which is about one standard deviations under the mean in a typical distribution curve. This would imply that less than 8% of people are Mentally Retarded.

The cultural label of Mental Retardation is used more freely. It typically says more about the person saying it, than the person being spoken about. Have a little respect.

2007-05-19 19:00:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The christians like to use some mystical back door on questions like this. They claim that since adam and eve were "perfect beings", their "perfect dna" somehow allowed them to have incestuous kids who were normal. This is because they are, themselves, retarded. I don't care how perfect your dna is, if animals interbreed within one or two generations, they are going to have deformed, or at least, mentally defective offspring. This can be proven using a theoretical model, but the christians will, of course, ignore any findings that prove this, out of sheer willful ignorance.

2007-05-19 19:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by Enslavementality 2 · 1 1

Gen 5:4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

God made the laws against family marriages later because there was no reason for it and it causes confusion. Therefore the sin against Gods later command is what produces the curses on mankind, not the act itself when there was no law from God concerning it.

2007-05-19 19:00:41 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen 2 · 1 1

LOL No, in fact the evolution of cephalization in animals took place earlier in marine animals before the promisiam development on land, which is strange considering how a dolphin is one of the most intelligent mammals after humans and not after chimpanzees

2007-05-19 18:57:56 · answer #6 · answered by ibid 3 · 0 1

I know what you mean. Sometimes it does feel like we're all mentally retarded, especially when you look at some of the questions they ask here!

2007-05-19 18:56:43 · answer #7 · answered by Sandy 7 · 1 0

And your points haven't gotten you any where, did they? That segment of the population that never questions their religion or much else, had NO desire to hear what others think, especially if they are on the "other side."

2007-05-19 18:58:40 · answer #8 · answered by ThisIsIt! 7 · 1 0

So you think that why people won't learn the lessons of history and keep repeating the same mistakes over and over and over without increased consciousness?

Hmmmm ... you may have something there!

2007-05-19 18:56:18 · answer #9 · answered by thing55000 6 · 0 0

adam and eve were perfect beings, their dna wasnt corrupt. even after they sinned and lost that perfection, thier dna hadnt gotten really jacked up.. they were closer to perfection than we are today. look at bible characters who lived for 100s of years, and as history has gone on, now we live for barely 100.

2007-05-19 19:00:02 · answer #10 · answered by nerdia00 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers