Evolution in the religious context....?

Question

Can I please make a point to all those arguing against evolution?

There is more proof for evolution than the theory of the heliocentricity of the solar system. Evolution HAS been observed with the creation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and pesticide resistance. New species of Mosquito have been observed to develop in the London Underground. These are facts. So noone can say that evolution is false today, false in the near-past or false in the future.

From my point of view you may only argue about whether God is directing evolution or not, or if most creatures today, whose evolutionary paths cannot be traced entirely, were created by a god or not. Otherwise you are being ignorant of the realities of the modern world.

Do you agree? Why (not)?

The award for ignorance and worst answer goes to STEVE HUSTINGS.....Well done steve on being a complete idiot number 1. IF you disagree with the proof of evolution then you must also disagree with the earth revolving around the Sun etc, for there is more proof for evolution than this concept. Get out of the stone age now you fool.

Answer 1

yup. i agree.

evolution is fact. i don't understand why people have such a hard time reconciling religion and evolution. why is it so hard to believe that god created the world and perpetuated the species THROUGH evolution?

Answer 2

I saw the poster depicting man’s evolving ascent from the crouching apes. However, they are only an artist’s rendering of the ideal of evolution. That is, only the last two skeletons are in any museum. All the rest of the creatures either have no physical basis, or are composed of a single bone or two. I hold up the same poster and declare that it depicts the ideal that God created all these forms as independent groups that did not evolve into one another.

I saw the picture of the growth from birth to full growth of human, bird, reptile, mammal, etc., all starting from a similar appearance. The idea is that all forms of life trace their evolutionary route during the stages of their birth. However, someone showed us the real appearance of the early births and they were unlike the drawings that portrayed evolution in an idealized light.

I saw the picture of a white moth on a dark tree and a dark moth on a dark tree, in London. London was getting dirty because of smog. Evolutionists hailed the appearance of the black moth as a sign of the white moth evolving into black to merge in with the darkened trees to escape the birds picking them off the bark. Then an evolutionist admitted to gluing a black moth to a black tree and shooting the picture. It was a hoax.

I saw the picture of the geologic column showing the layers of the earth and their approximate ages. Did you know that the geologic column depicts an ideal of evolution that is not found anywhere on earth?

The evolutionist accepts the fallacy of these pictures, even though they do not reflect science. They accept the phony, man-made portraits because they depict the ideal of evolution. That is, if the evolution model were true, these pictures show you what it would look like.

That is not science. Evolutionists try to tell us that evolution is based on fact. They have lied to us. Now give us a single fact that proves that all living creatures have evolved from a single organism. It cannot be done. Scientists are tired of finding yet more fossils that fit into already-defined groups of animals. There is no evidence for in-between creatures. And any mutants that we have come upon or have created in our zeal to prove evolution have lived handicapped, short-lived lives.

This is the reality of the modern world.

Answer 3

I agree.

However, there seems to be an inordinate amount of uneducated folk around tonight. They're confusing evolution with abiogenesis, and then claiming that scientists have changed their minds. It's laughable.

So don't expect too much agreement.

Edit: Hey, whaddaya know? I'm delighted to say that I was wrong. All of those multisyllables in your question must have scared them off. Well done!

Answer 4

Antievolutionists change the definition of evolution every five minutes. Good luck having them accept speciation, even when there are dozens of examples. (google observed speciation)

Answer 5

I don't agree, how do you argue with someone who doesn't believe in DNA and only believes in God?

Answer 6

evolution rocks!

Answer 7

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/superbugs.asp

i figure this says all i needed to

Answer 8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dnxHmvrrW0