An electromagnetic field could be created to hold the substance; also, a field created by air pressure could do the job, provided the substance didn't react with air (which, if there were a universal solvent seems likely). A radioactive material won't hold it. The other consideration is the speed of the solvency - if there exists a substance with which the solvent reacts very slowly, it would be possible to store it in such for a (relitavely) short period. Darnit, someone's already ruined my fun by mentioning water. CURSE YOU ALL!
2007-05-18 21:59:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by visible_fred 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd try dissolving the other universal solvent in it i.e WATER
2007-05-18 21:56:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd store it in two part that would react when mixed (like epoxy). Only then would it dissolve everything. Alternately, I'd keep it in a freezer in its frozen form. Solvents only dissolve things when liquid.
2007-05-19 05:22:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr. R 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"i think of all infants and senior voters shouldn't only be totally coated, yet additionally have the skill to get any surgical operation's or drugs they desire paid for by using the government." right this is the conservatives' situation with something being completed by using the government: something the government does, is funded by using the tax payers. Taxes are no longer voluntary, the government places a gun on your face and forcibly takes taxes from you. in case you do no longer comply, your existence is destroyed, your assets is taken, and you will desire to spend something of your existence in penal complex. So what you're offering (with stable intentions) is that if my grandmother chooses to eat junk nutrition and not exercising and demands a triple by using-bypass, that the government would desire to bypass to my fellow individuals, positioned a gun of their face, and scouse borrow their tricky earned money to pay for it. do no longer you notice the subject with that? Conservatives desire to help human beings. notwithstanding, we would desire to do it with out the government because of the fact the government embodies using stress. in case you supply $a hundred on your fellow guy out of affection and charity, that's noble. in case you supply $a hundred on your fellow guy because of the fact the government positioned a gun on your face and compelled you to, that's extortion. If I supply $a hundred each month voluntarily, and then I even have an emergency (motor vehicle breaks, roof leaks, etc.), i'm able to quickly cease giving and guard my family individuals. If i'm paying $a hundred in taxes and that i've got an emergency, then i'm screwed. i can't cease paying taxes for a month or 2 until i'm getting issues below administration. that's the version between intercourse and rape. that's the acceptable comparable actual act, the version is consent. there's no consent with the government. that's the reason conservatives oppose government social classes and prefer inner maximum social classes.
2016-12-29 12:50:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) You store it frozen.
2) Dimagnetic levitiation,
http://www.hfml.ru.nl/levitate.html
3) Google
"containerless processing" 46,800 hits
4) Not touching anything in free fall.
2007-05-19 06:27:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Uncle Al 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my universal container.
2007-05-18 21:55:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by liberty11235 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A magnetic field
2007-05-18 21:51:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tupperware, in the back of the refrigerator.
And we would never speak of it again until it was time to get a new refrigerator.
2007-05-18 21:55:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A pressurized air compartment.
2007-05-18 22:05:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by tonal9nagual 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The place has already occupied by Water.
2007-05-18 21:55:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by manjunath_empeetech 6
·
0⤊
0⤋