I think the funniest argument that any liberal has when in discussion with a conservative that supports the war in Iraq is the, "If you support the war, then why aren’t you over there fighting," argument. Instead of actually arguing on the reasons to go to war or the benefits/consequences of the war, liberals just throw cop out arguments at conservatives, or maybe just call them "racist", "Bigot", or "Nazi". I assume it is because they are backed into a corner and cannot find any rational explanation for their reasons besides silly knee-jerk emotions to war and many social issues.
By your reasoning, the only people allowed to comment on the space program, should be astronauts. The only people allowed to comment on the enforcement of the law should be policemen. The only people who are allowed to comment on health care should be doctors. This argument is absurd. Everyone citizen has a right to support or condemn national policy. Please, enough with the cop out arguments and... Argue.
2007-05-18
18:03:00
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Marine Corps PLC I will be commisioned in June 2009. Please don't try the cop out on me.
2007-05-18
19:14:18 ·
update #1
Wait, incog --- policemen don't have people trying to kill them? huh. You are a smart one aren't you.
2007-05-18
19:14:59 ·
update #2
Mac Ray --- and soldiers are the ones that should actually be in war. So, accordingly soldiers should be the only ones who can comment about war? Which they support...by a massive majority. I do not see how your statements effect my argument. The argument has no merits, it is a logical fallacy.
2007-05-18
20:02:58 ·
update #3
Mac Ray --- and soldiers are the ones that should actually be in war. So, accordingly soldiers should be the only ones who can comment about war? Which they support...by a massive majority. I do not see how your statements effect my argument. The argument has no merits, it is a logical fallacy.
2007-05-18
20:03:02 ·
update #4