.....wouldn't a lot of group photos have to be retaken?
2007-05-18 17:28:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Good point. I would buy stock in Kleenex in anticipation of this glorious event.
2007-05-18 17:32:03 · answer #1 · answered by Chairman LMAO 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, it'd be blurry for one as the photographer would probably not keep the camera steady; however, I do believe you've found the way to implement world peace.
2007-05-19 06:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nobody think to take a photo having an orgasm ... Uhmmm ...
2007-05-18 17:51:45 · answer #3 · answered by TYRONE! 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
9 .6 on the richter scale.
2007-05-18 17:31:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The world just might be a happier place.... at least my house would be lol
2007-05-18 17:58:14 · answer #5 · answered by Who is that red head??? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We would go through a lot of tissue, too.
2007-05-18 17:33:50 · answer #6 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no! because for once, you wouldnt have to tell everyone to say cheese just for a fake-@ss smile
2007-05-18 17:31:49 · answer #7 · answered by MandaPanda 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sure! because the polar ice caps would melt and al gore would say, "see, I told you."
2007-05-19 07:40:51 · answer #8 · answered by Luch d 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yep... that's funny... and wedding pics, school pics, and lots of TV editing too lol
2007-05-18 17:32:05 · answer #9 · answered by Stiffy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, the Earth would blow up.
2007-05-18 17:32:22 · answer #10 · answered by Rayne 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋