how about compared to the seven sisters area?
2007-05-18 12:25:45 · 6 answers · asked by Ashley L 1 in Travel ➔ United Kingdom ➔ London
I wouldn't want to live in either, but Mile End has some nice houses being build along the canal and the Olympics will force the council to improve matters further.
I would go for Mile End, the previous posters have obviously never been to both areas.
2007-05-18 12:48:10 · answer #1 · answered by Philip W 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I'd put both on just about the same scale busy/overcrowded/in need of some TLC however for transport links the northern line Seven Sisters is rubbish whereas Mile End covers the Docklands Light Railway/District/Central Line when it comes to people there is such a diversity of people in both areas its hard to say
2007-05-21 10:17:58 · answer #2 · answered by suki doo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a s*** hole, proper Al Queida recruiting ground. Seven Sisters a bit better but still not very clever.
Message for Phillip - Have you been to these areas? I don't think so. For your information I have been to Mile End many times, it's a s*** hole. Do you live in Tower Hamlets by any chance?
2007-05-18 12:30:06 · answer #3 · answered by BarrenDan 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
most people have accidents within a mile of their home and if you get murdered its much more likely to be by someone you know or a relative.....
source: studied that thingy subject cant remember its name....its an - ology ....sociology thats the one...
2007-05-18 12:33:25 · answer #4 · answered by scottish football ....nuff said 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Both are nice
2007-05-21 03:18:58 · answer #5 · answered by spiro goken 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its nasty. Dirty, litter everywhere, I would not even feel safe if was driving through it.
2007-05-18 12:33:26 · answer #6 · answered by tempest 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋