2007-05-18 09:54:40 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No they shouldn't be banned but I do not believe that they need to go into war. I agree with England's idea of not sending Harry into Iraq.
2007-05-18 09:57:15 · answer #1 · answered by blue-jeanbaby 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There could be no ban on the royals growing a member of the armed amenities. they ought to have an same get entry to as some thing persons - i'm no lover of the royal kin, yet a minimum of Harry is doing a ideal pastime on an same words as absolutely everyone else might want to, fairly than in simple terms trousering civil list money for beginning some council homes. no matter if a extreme profile soldier which incorporates Harry could serve in a wrestle zone could be a in simple terms operational selection. i think that taking pictures Prince Harry might want to be the form of propaganda victory for enemy forces in Iraq, that to deliver him into the front line might want to unnecessarily endanger any of the adult men serving with him. The insurgents might want to stop at no longer some thing to attain damage to the British Prince, although the safe practices of his colleagues might want to be significantly compromised if he were to serve in Iraq.
2016-11-04 09:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they shouldn't be banned. People risk their lives every day for our country and just because they are royalty it doesn't make them better than anyone else, so they should be sent off to the armed forces and see what it is like for a person to do some hard work once in a while and risk their lives daily.
Damn Royalty !
2007-05-18 10:02:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but they shouldn't go into combat. It puts the people around them in danger because they are major targets. I would not want to be standing next to a bullseye.
If they were sent into combat, anyone in that regiment should be allowed to go voluntarily understanding the extra risk involved by being with a 'Royal'.
I would not want to visit Iraq with Pres. Bush and I don't see how hanging out with Prince Harry over there is all that much different.
2007-05-18 10:02:55 · answer #4 · answered by Pico 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, they should be the same as everyone else - even more of leaders, specially since that´s what, all throughout history kings and queens did that´s WHY they did represent and protect the people of the country- and do something useful and set an example for a change...I thought that´s what there were for....apparently I was wrong..
2007-05-18 09:59:34 · answer #5 · answered by Sheldon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and they should be banned from joining the human race as well. Help stop Royal inbreeding.
2007-05-18 09:58:49 · answer #6 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, if it's good enough for everyone else, it's good enough for the Royal Family. I would love the see Bush's daughters put into uniform and sent overseas. Then maybe their stupid father would take this war seriously.
2007-05-18 09:59:18 · answer #7 · answered by Whiskey Tango Foxtrot 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as an ex- soldier i would say no to putting them on the front line, if they do insist on putting on a uniform to prove some point or other then they should be given a position where they can do the smallest amount of harm,if i was serving on active service then i would hate to have one of those imbeciles in charge over me and they also they make the troops around them more of a target
2007-05-18 10:03:18 · answer #8 · answered by Lyndon001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO but then again, I don't think that they should be banned from serving in war zones.
I think this is mollycoddling and Prince Charles should let his son's be something that he was never, and that is being a "MAN"
2007-05-18 09:58:38 · answer #9 · answered by The_Informer 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Throughout history, many Kings, Princes etc, have led armies into battle.....!
2007-05-18 09:58:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋