Does the MRSA bug exist in the King Edward V11 hospital for treatment of the royal family?

Question

In the light of the publicity recently that hospitals in the U.K. have a higher rate of the bug MRSA than any hospital in Europe, it came to mind whether the bug actually exist in this top private hospital

Answer 1

MRSA is a type of staff infection that is found every where. Its whats called an infection of oppertunity in other words if you have an open wound and touch something that has MRSA on it you can get it. So yes it is found in King Edward V11. The best way to prevent it is wash your hand as well as any cuts you have.

Answer 2

MRSA is a dormant infection that we all carry. The best way to cut down the spread of the infection from person to person is the use of "universal precautions." Basically wash hands and wear gloves, protective gown, and wear a mask when in the room of an infected patient. Every hospital/facillity has at least one patient with this infection.

Answer 3

look this up on the Internet--- Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus this is MRSA a bacterial infection that is resistive to many antibiotics can be found in urine skin feces eyes nose mouth etc there would be no "call" to use mrsa to treat people it is not a cure to something generally a doctor will not "treat" if you will a mrsa infection unless colonization of mrsa is greater than 100,000 colonies

Answer 4

does no longer be allowed :/, different than being a figurehead the only different purpose of a queen is to offer an inheritor to the throne. earlier you point out surrogacy or adoption an inheritor could desire to have 2 mom and father interior the royal relatives (eg. a king has a new child with a woman he's not married to, the new child isn't an inheritor). i assume they could take the king who isn't genetically touching directly to his relatives and use a member of the relatives as a surrogate yet that's quite extraordinary.