2007-05-18 08:16:16 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
They are supporting it enthusiastically.
Afterall, it is an important step in dominating a still somewhat free country, and imposing ever more draconian versions of thier racist agenda upon it.
2007-05-18 08:18:02 · answer #1 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have decided, since people say I am racist for not supporting amnesty for criminal invaders, I might as well go all out. At 1 pm CST today I mailed donation of two thousand dollars each to
Stormfront, United Klans of American, Aryan Nations, White Aryan Resistance and ordered a white robe and hood. Found a heck of a bargain on a metal propane fueld burning cross. Just need a spot on the front yard to install it. Who want s to help?
2007-05-18 15:27:14 · answer #2 · answered by pedohunter1488 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
well im not racist but im not sure i like the bill 100%. I will say that i only read an articel about it briefly.
pretty much i dont think this whole thing is a good idea. i have not heard a convincing argument as to why we should do this.
2007-05-18 15:19:20 · answer #3 · answered by Steven Colbert 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you do not support lawbreaking, why would you be called a racist?
2007-05-18 15:40:04 · answer #4 · answered by Melissa E 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is racist to expect someone to enter our country legally.
2007-05-18 15:19:00 · answer #5 · answered by RN_and_mommy 5 · 8⤊ 0⤋
None of them are going to use it because it will cost them $5,000 each.
2007-05-18 15:19:35 · answer #6 · answered by Pervtor of Pervatia 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
What is a law that protects law breakers?
2007-05-18 15:23:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
You mean Pelois she isn't happy with it.
2007-05-18 15:47:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Duh, with lynchings.
2007-05-18 15:18:47 · answer #9 · answered by clangston 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋