English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Attorney & Author Vincent Bugliosi, is about to release a Book. That will, in a sense, show evidence that agrees with The Warren Commissions findings that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.

Mr Bugliosi, calls Oliver Stone's Movie, `JFK'. (quoting) "One continuous lie!".

Is there any evidence, that you see to agree with that finding? Or would you be interested in seeing what he has to show?
Is your mind, made up already?

Were you around, on that dreadful day? If so, what do you remember about it?

2007-05-18 06:02:17 · 19 answers · asked by Nunya Bidniss 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Jeepers! Hell hath no furry. Like that of xennypoo scorned! You go girl!

2007-05-18 07:29:43 · update #1

19 answers

I was around and I have quite vivid memories of that day. I also read books by people like Fletcher Prouty and some others who would disagree with Mr. Bugliosi. Like some other's I believe that there were three gunmen, just from the forensic evidence available.

2007-05-18 06:47:01 · answer #1 · answered by libstalker 4 · 2 0

I remember it. I also know that Mr. Stone is very much a system man who does as he is told in helping shape public opinion or just plainly entertaining people.

Like everyone else who doesn't want to deal with the issues. Mr. Bugliosi may be correct but I'll bet any amount of money he has written a book with enough facts to keep people interested enough to line his pockets.

Like most people who write.

What Mr. Bugliosi probably does, like you, and anyone else on here is, is give a wide berth to the technology now in play everywhere, which everyone is mum on and has been around since that time which more than likely was used to assasinate the president.

This I do NOT perceive any boldness on - of any kind - from anyone. Save yourself a little money and go to the library; pick up this book:

" The Killing Of a President " Even though there's a foreword by Mr. Stone it doesn't hurt anything, and the information helps fill in a few gaps.

It isn't conclusive or definitive in and of itself, but if you've got the other legwork together, it tells you exactly what was done and how it happened.

Oh. Mr. B. may call it " one continuous lie " but let's hope he isn't writing a sequel of lies. People are like that you know.

2007-05-18 06:17:50 · answer #2 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0 1

The way his head bobbles and the angle Oswald was at, and the fact that now recently theyre saying it could be more than 2 bullet fragments that were found....

Add that to Oswald was using a bolt action rifle, and to get 2 shots off from his angle, at a moving target is highly unlikely.
Everyone says he was a marine, but they used the M-1 Rifle, and Oswald never qualified as an expert, moseso barely achieved passing as a sharpshooter and a marksman

I think this is merely a governemnt over up to continually gargle the facts up.
What was Oswaldds MoS in the marines, because he was not an expert with the rifle.

So 2 shots from that distance at a high position on a moving vehicle, compared to how JFK's head bobbles twice in the car...well it all shows that Oswald was not the only one out there with a firearm

This is merely another guy trying to get rich off the JFK assassination. Sell a book make a few dollars
heckmaybe I should start my own research.

2007-05-18 06:10:14 · answer #3 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 1 1

There is NO way Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. He was too stupid. Facts are, Jfk was shot dead, at close range, as is the only way possible, from a gutter, under the sidewalk of the grassy knoll. He was not shot from the grassy knoll, or any upper level from the Library. He did shoot the rifle off, but only to cause a confusion to witnesses, all around, so the true murderer could get away. I have studied this a lot, watched every program on the subject. Not many folks know about the gutter on the sidewalk directly under the grassy knoll, do they? Thank the History Channel for that knowledge to me. I also listened to the tapes of phone conversations made by Lyndon B. Johnson released, about 5 years ago, where he practically admitted having something to do with it all. Remember that the government refused to release all the tapes of that era, even though it's the law, so after 40 years have gone by, American people can know wtf happened? Gee, I wonder why? Because the democratic government is GUILTY of hiring the Mafia, Jack Ruby, also a killer, to take out JFK, because he wasn't going to do as he was told, go to Vietnam. LBJ was directly in charge of that operation to kill JFK. Made him rich too. Lady bird owned 1/3 stocks in Brown, and Root, the only company allowed to bid to make new military attire for our troops, for Vietnam. Gee, Brown and Root won the bid! I wonder why? Duh.
Jack Ruby didn't go to prison, and murder a man because he loved JFK so much. He did it to shut Lee Harvey Oswald's mouth!
F LBJ.

2007-05-18 07:17:01 · answer #4 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1 0

I was a kid. I remember leaving school that day and knowing JFK had been shot -- and arriving home to find out he had died sometime in the meantime. (Oswald was shot on live TV during a Sunday afternoon nap. !!)

I have read many books that dope out all possible conspiracy theories: Cuban exiles; Castro; CIA; Mafia; a cartel of wealthy Texas oil millionaires. Much of what is presented in those books is compelling. And I think no one has explained the physics of the single bullet theory convincingly to date. BUT...

I am always interested to read about it and hear about it, even new theories, old theories, new/old or old/new theories. Funny that the most creative and off the wall theory these days seems to be that Oswald acted alone. Everything old is new again...

2007-05-18 06:10:42 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6 · 1 0

I was born exactly 30 days after that dreadful day, my mother often tells me I was her only comfort during the mourning of President Kennedy. I do believe Oswald acted alone, because there are no facts to make me believe different, I also find it hard to take anything coming out of Hollywood serious, ex. Michael Moore.

2007-05-18 06:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by deedee2qu 3 · 0 0

You know I was about 3 years old at the time, I remember watching the funeral. As far as having a made up mind, I don't know who killed him, if it was the work of 1 or many. What's done is done and what good is rehashing it over and over again going to do? If there was someone else involved they are most likely dead or very old by now. Same as with Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley, Anna Nicole Smith, they are dead let them rest.

2007-05-18 06:18:20 · answer #7 · answered by Lori B 6 · 0 0

I don't know. I've seen several documentaries that show both sides, a lone gunman in the school book depository and several gunmen on the grassy knoll. Both sides seem plausible to me, but I guess only God knows the truth.

2007-05-18 07:09:58 · answer #8 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 0 0

I was about 8 and I remember coming home from church and watching Ruby shoot Oswald on our black and white tv. It was the first time I recall watching an event being played over and over. That's about all I can remember.

2007-05-18 06:09:00 · answer #9 · answered by katydid 7 · 1 0

I have not have been given any thought the place it got here from, notwithstanding that is only asserting that the only thank you to get somwhere is to go in that course and shop moving until you get there. that could be a actual holiday spot or a milestone on your existence.

2016-12-29 11:15:41 · answer #10 · answered by carnohan 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers