According to a respondant to another of my questions, a US Soldier was treated for burns cause by munitions that had sulfuric mustard. He reported that they are constantly finding such signs of WMDs.
I had heard a report a couple of years ago that Jordan intercepted WMDs entering their country from Syria (the report came from NPR). Then the report disappeared.
Now I am wondering if there is a website that I could go to, in order to see exactly what all has been found, and what is counted as being of a WMD type.
If you know of any such site, let me know. If not and you know, factually, of any WMDs that have been found in Iraq, please let me know.
P.S. If you know how I can get a DOD Report that verifies the WMD, and reports on its findings that I could get a hold of, then I am willing to create that website, if it does not exist as the American People have the right to know the truth.
2007-05-18
05:10:46
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Vman 2040
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Bent Spoon, just because Bayer holds a patent, does not mean that someone could not make it else where without Bayer's help or knowledge, but thanks for the info, as I did not know Bayer made such stuff still.
Sorry the rest of you believe the propaganda of the Democrats and the Scardipublicans about it not being there. That only adds to the chance that what was over there, might be here. Then again, something worse could have been found that they don't want any one to know about, as that we are talking about the seat of the oldest known civilizations to ever existed, quite possibly with highly advanced knowledge (possibly).
2007-05-18
05:36:14 ·
update #1
I see denial is the pattern of the day here. Those who say nothing has been found are blind, ignorant, or just obtuse.
2007-05-18 05:20:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by thegubmint 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
MUSTARD GAS IS NOT A WMD
The Army War College did extensive research on what was found, what was used and what was missing.
We gave Sadaam a lot of Mustard Gas, a real low tech Chemical used in World War I to cover your retreat. He used it extensively in his war with Iran. It is NOT considered a WMD, it's practicle purpose has been replaced by tear gas.
In fact the the famous gassing of kurds in Halabja turned out this way. Halabja was near the front and the Iranians were advancing. The Iraqis used Mustard Gas to cover thier retreat. That is rarely fatal probably the only fatal casualties would have been infants or very aged.
Then the Iranians used a blood agent, which we had issued the Shah of Iran to kill off defenders. So it was Iran not Iraq that killed those Kurdish villagers. The reports cites the hemmoraging evident on the bodies as evidence since we had never given those type weapons to Iraq.
2007-05-18 05:25:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I've seen all the weapons inspection reports from the UN and the British Governemnts "dodgy Dossier"
There were NEVER any WMD's in Iraq. The UK Government lied in order to support the US led invasion that ensued
5 Weapons experts were discredited by the UK and US immediatly prior to the Invasion of Iraq, one of which (Dr David Kelly) apparently commited suicide as a direct result of the MoD's (Ministry of Defence) lack of duty of care to Dr Kelly.
Suprisingly, the Governemnt refused a formal coroners inquest into the death of Dr Kelly, chosing instead to chose a trail judge to look into the cause of his death, essentially denying the judge the powers to question or extract information from governemnt sources.
To this day, the UK and US maintain that the weapons existsed, though the focus of the Invasion was quickly shifted to freeing the People of Iraq from the clutches of a dictator, something they could have done 10 years prior, but when oil prices were stable enough.
2007-05-18 05:20:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by gary_j_hay 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Just because WMD were not found under the definition of what an WMD is supposed to be doesn't mean they did not have wheapons, they did, and they did not have intent, they did. Check out the numbers of people blown up by roadside makeshift bombs, it's a substantial number and they are not classified as a WMD wheapon but is effectively used to kill lots of people.
2007-05-26 04:18:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by RT 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there was one it would be printed on Tony Snow's podium. There were no WMD's. There were old artillery shells that some republicans tried to pass off as "found wmd's" but even the pentagon dismisses those claims. Colin Powell didn't go before the UN to talk about 15 year old shells with degraded chemical agents.
2007-05-18 05:26:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you can find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq then by all means create a website. The whole world would like to know.
2007-05-18 05:25:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by p00756 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Go to www.google.com
type in Weapons of Mass Destruction in the search bar
then hit the "I feel lucky" tab beneath the search bar.
It will take you to the WMD page.
2007-05-18 05:20:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i do not recognize of a information superhighway website. yet I did listen that they did discover yellow cake (raw uranium). additionally they discovered different issues that are parts of w.m.d.s. it would want to be interesting to have the form of information superhighway website to envision.
2016-11-04 08:29:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can list the number of WMDs for you right here.
0
2007-05-18 05:16:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by truthspeaker10 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
mustard gas is made by Bayer. Have a look in your medicine cabinet for that name. Is it that you're concerned they sold some to your enemies or do you dislike mustard gas itself? Would you prefer to just chop a person up with hot lead?
2007-05-18 05:20:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I don't know about all of them, but David Kay back in 2004 documented these among others.
A prison laboratory complex that may have been used for human testing of BW agents and "that Iraqi officials working to prepare the U.N. inspections were explicitly ordered not to declare to the U.N." Why was Saddam interested in testing biological-warfare agents on humans if he didn't have a biological-weapons program?
"Reference strains" of a wide variety of biological-weapons agents were found beneath the sink in the home of a prominent Iraqi BW scientist. "We thought it was a big deal," a senior administration official said. "But it has been written off [by the press] as a sort of 'starter set.'"
New research on BW-applicable agents, brucella and Congo-Crimean hemorrhagic fever, and continuing work on ricin and aflatoxin that were not declared to the United Nations.
A line of unmanned aerial vehicles, UAVs, or drones, "not fully declared at an undeclared production facility and an admission that they had tested one of their declared UAVs out to a range of 500 kilometers [311 miles], 350 kilometers [217 miles] beyond the permissible limit."
"Continuing covert capability to manufacture fuel propellant useful only for prohibited Scud-variant missiles, a capability that was maintained at least until the end of 2001 and that cooperating Iraqi scientists have said they were told to conceal from the U.N."
"Plans and advanced design work for new long-range missiles with ranges up to at least 1,000 kilometers [621 miles] -- well beyond the 150-kilometer-range limit [93 miles] imposed by the U.N. Missiles of a 1,000-kilometer range would have allowed Iraq to threaten targets throughout the Middle East, including Ankara [Turkey], Cairo [Egypt] and Abu Dhabi [United Arab Emirates]."
In virtually every case -- chemical, biological, nuclear and ballistic missiles -- the United States has found the weapons and the programs that the Iraqi dictator successfully concealed for 12 years from U.N. weapons inspectors.
The Iraq Survey Group, ISG, whose intelligence analysts are managed by Charles Duelfer, a former State Department official and deputy chief of the U.N.-led arms-inspection teams, has found "hundreds of cases of activities that were prohibited" under U.N. Security Council resolutions, a senior administration official tells Insight.
"There is a long list of charges made by the U.S. that have been confirmed, but none of this seems to mean anything because the weapons that were unaccounted for by the United Nations remain unaccounted for."
Both Duelfer and his predecessor, David Kay, reported to Congress that the evidence they had found on the ground in Iraq showed Saddam's regime was in "material violation" of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, the last of 17 resolutions that promised "serious consequences" if Iraq did not make a complete disclosure of its weapons programs and dismantle them in a verifiable manner.
The United States cited Iraq's refusal to comply with these demands as one justification for going to war.
The attached article has more details. I would also assume that all of David Kay's reports should be public record somewhere. I'd check Duelfer's reports for more after 2004.
Although these WERE reported and widely, apparently it's always buried on the back pages. I wonder why.
2007-05-18 05:16:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋