I think Los Angeles and San Antonio.
2007-05-18 04:41:06 · 22 answers · asked by SUPADAVE25 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
LA for sure, and maybe Portland......
2007-05-18 05:02:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Los Angeles would be an obvious choice, given that it's the second largest metropolitan area in the country, and a major media outlet.
Not San Antonio, however. Texas doesn't need another team. For that matter, the NFL doesn't need anymore teams, either. The league is already watered down. If LA gets a team it will have to be a relocation of an existing team.
2007-05-18 11:54:51 · answer #2 · answered by phil5775 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Los Angeles for sure since they have had teams before. San Antonio would be ok. They would have that pyramid thing like they do in the NBA with teams in Dallas, Houston and San Antonio. How about Las Vegas?
2007-05-18 11:49:01 · answer #3 · answered by Solomon Grundy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Los Angeles
Portland
2007-05-18 11:49:46 · answer #4 · answered by orzoff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Los Angeles and perhaps Portland. San Antonio and Memphis are possibilities.
2007-05-18 11:45:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Las Vegas and Los Angeles
2007-05-18 12:02:23 · answer #6 · answered by Bryan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it would be L.A. and San Antonio...
Due to the fact that L.A. already has a stadium sitting there hardly being used...plus they need a professional team down there... More rivals!
San Antonio seemed to have been trying to pull the Saints in to their grasp but failed because nobody wanted to give up in N.O. but of course they have the money and will eventually get their own team since they seem to be some what determined to get a team into their hands....
2007-05-18 11:51:11 · answer #7 · answered by kmethod42 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well B 4 they expand! I just wanna say this " Jets get your own stadium", LA huh? I think they had more than a few chances to have a team!,didn't they? San Antonio,.I agree! Why not Hawaii?
2007-05-18 12:02:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
they shouldn't expand, they should contract, but if the do... I'll say...
LA - although I hope they can keep a team finally.
Las Vegas
though San Antonio would be good... texas doesn't need another team.
2007-05-18 11:50:21 · answer #9 · answered by JMac440 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
California already has three NFL teams and Texas has two, neither of them need another one.
Vegas and Nashville are good choices. They are two rapidly growing cities who would make prime locales for a new franchise.
2007-05-18 11:46:09 · answer #10 · answered by Jordan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too many teams in TX & CA. I say somewhere with interesting weather, like Portland or Michigan or maybe even put two in Canada like the NBA did. I think the NFL would have sucess with teams in Canada.
2007-05-18 11:55:01 · answer #11 · answered by Foush 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋