2007-05-18 02:28:51 · 11 answers · asked by Mr. Beef Stroganoff 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Pinche L, do you understand that by allowing only one group of illegal to obtain legal status, US government is practicing racism? You don’t even know me and calling me racist? Oh well
2007-05-18 03:42:45 · update #1
Corporate america, which controls the government, and to whom the government caters, is loving the endless supply of cheap labor. That's why a blind eye was turned over the past several years. Now that the situation is beyond control, of course some politicians have to make it sound like they are actually concerned. It is an absolute abomination in this day and age of automation and technology that so many millions of people are working for no more than chump change.
2007-05-18 02:47:46 · answer #1 · answered by emcgman 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Republican Party represents Big Business. Big Business wants a cheap labor supply and immigrants provide that. Plus having an easy flow of replacement workers helps the Republican Party and Big Business to break unions and drive down wages and benefits so fewer people have health insurance. It works well--for THEM. And the Middle Class listens to Rush Limbaugh and votes for it. Too bad, its their funeral.
2007-05-18 02:42:55 · answer #2 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i do not see some thing hypocritical about being hostile to abortion. The state has continuously had an ethical foundation for regulations and homicide has continuously been unlawful. it truly is often no longer a federal offense; it truly is hostile to the state. the federal authorities were given into this offense with the civil rights circulation. because some states did not implement the regulations hostile to homicide on those who might want to pick to homicide blacks. Abortion became continuously considered homicide until eventually the best courtroom determined an infant nevertheless contained in the womb did no longer have human rights. considering that that ruling technologies, inclusive of sonograms, printed the human form of even an rather youthful infant interior a woman's womb. of course, which could make us re-study that ruling- no longer regulation. it truly is unquestionably homicide to take the existence of an infant- in or out of the womb. Redefining marriage to in effective condition the sexual proclivities of a particular part of our society is likewise no longer mandatory. The preponderance of info might want to could be on the aspect of those who prefer to modify that definition. it isn't a human rights argument. Homosexuals were cohabiting for years. no individual is prohibiting that. I also agree that the federal authorities could no longer be in touch. The courts could allow the states settle on those regulations in accordance with their inhabitants's judgements.
2016-11-04 08:09:56 · answer #3 · answered by andry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the end they are politicians, basically whores for votes and money which brings power. each side thinks by selling out to these damn illegals they will get thier votes!We really need to Fire all incumbent politicians and have real term limits and make the congress a part time job!!
And Yes I voted for him twice, But I am Very dissapointed with President Bush, I believe the party has left me, now he too is abandoning me. WE REALLY NEED ANOTHER REAGAN NOW!!!!!
2007-05-18 02:59:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clearly all of government is out of touch with the best interests of the American middle class.
The Republican Congress did not put this legislation forward. This Congress is playing games at the expense of the nation.
2007-05-18 02:33:59 · answer #5 · answered by Shrink 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Democratic controled congress. And not to mention that this is the one single issue where Bush sides with the Dems.
2007-05-18 02:41:50 · answer #6 · answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they have sold out to industries who benefit from cheap, tax-free labor. Simple as that.
How else can you explain why 6 years of republican Congress and White House produced ZERO immigration enforcement?
2007-05-18 02:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by goldspider79 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Easy. It's not a Republican, conservative government.
2007-05-18 02:33:26 · answer #8 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
the damn liberals want amnesty for those fools! How does on Republican President fight the damocratic congress by himself?
2007-05-18 02:38:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we would have maintained a Republican majority, this would have never happened.
Thank your Congress!
2007-05-18 02:37:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋