English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/LegalEthics/ImmoralityOfIncomeTax.htm

2007-05-18 01:54:44 · 7 answers · asked by golfnuttoday 1 in Business & Finance Taxes Other - Taxes

7 answers

No, it's not -immoral. As members of this society, we are all obligated to contribute financially to the good of society as a whole. This includes money for infrastructure and social/economic programs for the community.

The IRS does not have too much power. People should pay their damn taxes.

2007-05-18 01:58:02 · answer #1 · answered by katzchen75 4 · 3 0

It fits the Black's Law definition of "theft" perfectly.

It also would seem that income taxes violate the 13th Amendment prohibition of "involuntary servitude", as it requires one to contribute a portion of their labor to some nebulous concept of the "common good". It is this same "common good" that has prevented the construction of new nuclear power plants for a generation, prevented domestic oil production and refinement, and keeps gasoline prices high through gasoline taxes that dwarf oil company profits.

Yes, the IRS has too much power, and yes, they are above the law, but what are you going to do about it? They have guns, so the only option is to educate the public, but the first answer shows the problem with that very clearly. People have forgotten what it is to be free, and think we are born with whatever duty the majority thinks we should have to the state.

Income taxes "fair"? How preposterous. Whether it is "progressive" as we have, rising with income, or "regressive", declining with income, or "flat", the same percentage alwasy, it is NOT "fair". No matter how you slice it, some pay more than they get, making it patently unfair. The only really fair tax is a voluntary tax, specifically import tariffs and user fees. No, we do not need an income tax to run the government, we did just fine without it until the early 1900's. We even had enough money to fund a Civil War, a war with Mexico, nearly one with Canada, and two with England. A "fair income tax" is a non sequitur. The closest you can get to "fair" is "one that won't make people revolt".

2007-05-18 02:10:58 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 2 2

The income tax is NOT immoral. The current tax system has allowed this country to defeat Nazi Germany and The Soviet Union. It allows us to live with personal freedoms that millions only dream of.

The IRS does the bidding of Congress. Congress is above the law; not the IRS.

2007-05-19 16:00:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As lots of the others have reported, there's a regulation. I won't hassle repeating it. notwithstanding, in case you nevertheless believe there's no longer a regulation, would i desire to propose some hazard evaluation. There are only 4 effects in case you make certain to cease paying taxes. a million. you do no longer pay taxes and the IRS on no account notices. that is uncommon and oftentimes only works for people who artwork strictly money jobs. 2. you do no longer pay taxes, the IRS does be conscious yet makes a decision to no longer cost you with against the regulation. instead, the IRS makes use of strictly civil strikes to place liens on any assets, grab your economic company debts and garnish your wages. you're assessed effects and interest and finally end up owing 2 to 3 situations extra advantageous than the taxes. 3. you do no longer pay taxes, the IRS does be conscious and makes a decision to document criminal quotes against you. You get rather fortunate and are acquitted. notwithstanding, an acquittal does no longer absolve you of your income tax felony duty. For the top result, see 2. 4. you do no longer pay taxes, the IRS does be conscious and makes a decision to document criminal quotes against you. you're convicted on some, if no longer all counts interior the indictment. you're sentenced for everywhere from 8 months to quite a few years in penal complex. you nevertheless OWE TAXES, effects and interest. For the top result, see 2. Now, because there are only 4 effects and 3 of them are undesirable, do you quite think of that could be a stable thought to no longer pay taxes?

2016-12-29 10:08:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Income tax in itself is nessessay to pay for our Govenment spending, it is how that money is spent that can be immoral, that is your Representatives in Congress, not the IRS. The IRS has been pretty lax in the last few years letting people get away with filing false returns, fraud, and not filing as long as what you get is less than 10,000 dollars. They are getting more stringent (about time) and as a government agency can, make your life miserable if you don't take them seriously, and will give you chances as long as you don't ignore them. We all get screwed if people don't pay what they owe.

2007-05-18 02:11:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In order to pay for the toilet seats we need to pay our taxes... so no not immoral....

IRS does have power only when fraudulent activities and bad accounting takes place that causes less money to the government...

Above the law no? They use the FBI in order to come to your house for tax evasion...

2007-05-18 02:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by De 5 · 0 0

Sorry, but income taxes are the FAIREST of all taxes. A graduated income tax system takes into account the taxpayer's ability to pay, unlike most other taxes.

Property taxes are second best as they are generally linked to the ability to pay at least during your productive years. However once you retire on a fixed income like most folks do, your ability to pay erodes over time.

Sales taxes are the worst of all, since the poor generally have to spend a much higher portion of their total income on taxable essentials of life whereas the wealthy have much more leeway in how much of their amassed wealth is spent and how much is simply retained.

Personally I'd rather see ALL other taxes dumped in favor of a slightly higher income tax rate, indexed to both my income and inflation. As my income rises, I really don't mind paying some extra as it will all level out later on as my income falls during retirement.

2007-05-18 02:35:27 · answer #7 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers