Does it make sense to send troops halfway around the world to defend freedom and democracy, only to compromise the homeland by leaving the back door open to the desperate and opportunistic hordes?
2007-05-18 01:33:41 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sending the legions off to fight in a far-away place while barbarians stream into the homeland, while with rhetoric trivializing the danger from the barbarians and exaggerating the danger of the more distant enemy, is a trick that corrupt leaders have used since ancient times.
Wonka, is there a free market for military secrets too? I'm pretty sure that if no enemy wanted to buy our military secrets, all the spies would leave. Unfortunately, there are foreigners whose interests are opposed to the interests of Americans, and that's where BOTH espionage and illegal immigration come from. Yes, it's the "free market," but that is not an argument for letting it continue to happen.
A president who tries to give amnesty to millions of illegal invaders in his country is a traitor, pure and simple. And I'm sure that there are plenty of traitors in Congress, too. But the very fact that the debate over amnesty has become so visible means that there's also considerable resistance to the amnesty proposal.
If "all" of the Senators and Representatives, and the President, were in favor of amnesty, it would simply and quietly be done, and the Jewish media wouldn't make much fuss over it. They'd try to sneak it by. So what must be happening is that some Congressmen are objecting to amnesty, perhaps even calling it treason (which it is), and the ruckus is intended to pressure them into shutting up and getting with the program.
MCL, life isn't a fair game with rules, and the stakes aren't points or prizes, but survival, continued existence of ourselves and our people. Just because we conquered the previous inhabitants of North America doesn't mean that we must wimpily approve of our own displacement. No, we may fight the invaders just as fiercely as the Amerinds once fought us. Don't look for moral justifications from a game players handbook. Look for them in natural science, instead.
2007-05-18 02:26:05 · answer #1 · answered by blaringhorn 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is the person who asked this question a Native American?
If not we must remeber that we are all the ancestors of immigrants that came here to make a better life for themselves. (Not opportunistic hordes) Doesn't the Statue of Liberty say give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. I don't blame anyone trying to make a better life for themselves.
The best way to adress this situation though is to adress the issue of world poverty. This would not only lead to a decline in the influx of immigrants but would also be a peaceful detterent to future terrorist attacks. World leaders need to get together and try to establish some sort of universal minnimum wage. As long as corporate America and business elites are allowed to exploit the labor of hard working immigrants. Immigrants will continue to migrate to America and perform the hardest and worse jobs here often. (working for less then most American citzens.)
HEY "IIlegal immigration has always been a problem in America just ask the Native Americans."
2007-05-18 02:00:49 · answer #2 · answered by MCL 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For all of the useful idiots who want to pin this on the Executive Branch, you have failed 6th grade civics.
The Congress proposes and writes the laws. The Exec approves and enforces.
If you do not like this you need to get the commies like Kennedy and the others to stop it, but you will not succeed because the commies in congress have sold our country and our rights to the highest bidder.
Should this travesty go to the Presidents desk, do not be surprised to see a veto. I have asked him and you should as well, do it right now, turn off Y!A and email the Pres at www.congress.org/ and email your senators as well, the vote is on Monday, if they get a few million emails maybe they will listen.
I am doing this next, and I have called their offices today, and sent two emails already. These people may be power mad but the are not stupid, you can move them if they get a million emails tonight. SO do it, be a friggin AMerican, Send them twenty emails but do it tonight, right NOW>
http://capwiz.com/gopusa/issues/alert/?alertid=9771356
http://capwiz.com/gopusa/issues/alert/?alertid=9771356
2007-05-18 14:28:51 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you on this, and I am a conservative.
For reasons unknown to me (or anyone for that matter) President Bush seems driven to push for open borders in the USA. Perhaps he believes that this is the ultimate expression of global thinking and will help the US in the end, but he couldn't be more wrong. Wealth is something that is accrued over time and via hard work. It is coveted by others, and is all too easy for polliticians to squander for the cause of their political careers. In this case many politicians think they will gain by giving away the store to illegal immigrants they will inherit a voting block of uneducated poor that will vote for them forever as long as they get benefits. Perhaps they are right, but is it good for America? Not if you are a native American, because YOU are paying for their experiment.
President Bush is wrong on this, and so is the Senate. We must stop them before it is too late, and our voice is silenced.
Email your representatives now!
2007-05-18 01:43:45 · answer #4 · answered by Eric K 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The border has been open and illegals have been coming over for how long? I can guarantee it started before 2000. We can blame every president and member of congress who served in the 20th century for this problem. Our current leadership (all of them) is merely carrying on the tradition.
2007-05-18 01:46:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Surely you don't think George Bush is solely responsible for this charade. Kennedy, Feinstein, McCain, Kyl and many other of our ?representatives? are in unison on this charade.
This is the biggest sell-out of Americans we've ever had. It is written strictly in the interest of the illegals.
Not one of these conditions will be upheld. Who in the government is going to monitor this? It will be business as usual or another massive corrupt bureaucracy.
Kennedy elaborated on how important it was for extended families together and that they must be united. He talked about his large family. Well at least the Kennedys can support themselves. We, the people, will have to support all these extended families.
McCain certainly has lost my vote!
2007-05-18 01:46:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Mass immigration is simply a way of america to control inflation. The more poor (immigrants etc) there are - means the more the dollar will eventually be worth.
That is all this is about.
2007-05-18 01:56:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He has the same globalist agenda the first Bush did. He doesn't believe America should be an actual country, just an idea. And Congress seems to be happy to oblige.
Call your Senators and demand no amnesty and secure borders.
2007-05-18 01:56:01 · answer #8 · answered by mikey 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It relies upon on what you advise by using punishment. I doubt that he will have any hardship with the regulation, yet for something of his existence (and longer) his usa will bear in innovations his strikes. each action has a result. some could interpret those outcomes as punishments.
2017-01-10 06:17:14 · answer #9 · answered by kunich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not just George Bush my friend. Open your blinders and look around. It is many of the senate and congressional leaders from both sides that have been and are doing it now.
We all need to step back and look at the big picture. It's not just one person or entity that is doing this. It's ALL of American government.
2007-05-18 01:38:43 · answer #10 · answered by scottdman2003 5 · 9⤊ 1⤋