How good is AMD processors now compared to intel processors ?

Question

Considering servers into account for example : WEB Servers.

Is it suitable

Answer 1

Not as fast as Intel's C2D technology but good performance per watt. Good AMD processors for desktops are now SO affordable. But this may change in the 3rd quarter once the single core versions of C2D are out.

Answer 2

To whoever posted the link to CNET. DON'T READ IT. It was published 2 years a go, thats a long time in the processor world.

AMD used to be the best value for money when you made your own computer, and certainly were when i made mine, now they are not. Intel have released their core 2 duo chips, and ALL of the core 2 duo chips beat their competitors int he same price range. Plus they have great overclocking headroom.

AMD haven't released a new type of processor since the core 2 duo was released, so AMD are of course going to be behind in terms of power, as their new architecture hasn't had the chance to compete against intel.

Go intel, im not an intel fanboy (as i have already said I have an AMD), but the core 2 duos are much much better value for money than the AMD's.

SORRY *edit* didnt see you said webservers, its a pretty close call with servers, if you chose AMD over intel there shouldn't be any major drawbacks

Answer 3

AMD are lagging behind Intel a little at the moment, but they are both improving all the time. If you're looking for something specifically for web-serving etc, you don't really need a super-fast chip anyway - you'd be better off with a dual or multicore processor. The benefit you'll get from intel is NOT enough to justify upgrading your whole system if it's already AMD based, but if you're building from scratch, generally, AMD is slightly better value for money, while intel is a little ahead when it comes to pure processing power.

Answer 4

reward of AMD a million. AMD has the terrific gaming processors those daysas they have a greater physically powerful cache 2. twin cores (in the X2's or maybe numbered FX's) communicate directly to a minimum of one yet another 3. New Athlon chips have a committed memory bus, meaning that they convey with the computing gadget's RAM on one line and something of the computing gadget on yet another, quite than having all verbal replace jammed right into a single bus. 4. Athlon has accompanied stronger Virus secure practices (EVP) that's a processor-point virus blocker. Intel has plans to apply this sooner or later, yet Athlon has it now. 5. twin center seems to make each and every of the adaptation .. AMD is maximum efficient the %. top now. And, they are greater low priced 6.AMD chips use much less means and are greater low priced to equilivant Intel chips. unfavorable aspects of AMD a million.in case you opt for for AMD you're constrained to DDR memory an Intel processor you ought to use the quicker DDR2 memory 2.AMD makes use of crystal® technologies which i like it!! yet once you supply it difficult artwork for long term the crystals start to burn and you will burn your CPU!!! 3.AMD is far less solid reward of Intel a million. people desire Intel because of the fact they are attentive to it and so as that they've type loyalty, 2. in an Intel processor you ought to use the quicker DDR2 memory 3. INTEL® makes use of cabon™ technologies which isn't undesirable yet once you artwork on TOO speedy and HEAVY proccesing the carbon starts off to heat and decreases the CPU genuine time 4. AMD grants you greater useful gaming overall performance, yet because of the fact the pics card is greater inportant in recent times, i'd pass with Intel. Their chips furnish greater useful stability. 5.Intel is a lot greater proper for workplace purposes. unfavorable aspects of Intel a million. present day Intel fashions are quite getting overwhelmed by technique of AMD for gaming 2.on the twin center, the suggestions has to pass away the processor to pass to the different center.

Answer 5

They are very good .. for a long time till now, AMD's architecture was a generation ahead when compare to pentium 4 .. but right now the core 2 architecture is ahead and performing better .. but at a higher cost .. if you want a value for money server, then go for AMD Opteron.. Intel Xeon also performs in a similar way .. Its only on desktop processors that core 2 duo performs better than amd x2 . ..

Answer 6

AMD sucks like hell now. Their processors (every single one) are eons behind the Intel processors in speed, For a server, get the Pentium D Dual Core and for desktops, get Core 2 Duo.

Answer 7

It is still about the same intel is a powerful processor and as amd improves so does intel ,My thought stick with intel....

Answer 8

It really depends on which AMD and which Intel processor.

Answer 9

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10442_7-6389077-1.html
Head to head on cnet.