He did none of the above.
He did E.
E.- Didn't submit it to the Senate to be ratified.
But the reason he didn't submit it to the senate to be ratified, is because in 1997 the Senate voted 95-0 on the
Byrd-Hagel Resolution (S. Res. 98), which listed serious faults with the treaty.
Also note, that President Bill Clinton never submitted the Kyoto treaty to the Senate for ratification either.
Even though he was in office for 3 years after the Kyoto Treaty was signed.
From 2000-2004, the United States' CO2 emissions growth rate was 2.1%, compared to the EU-15's 4.5%. That happened while the US economy was expanding 38% faster than the economies of the EU-15 while experiencing population growth at twice the rate of the EU-15.
2007-05-18 01:21:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i understand that the left basically likes to show out his disasters yet certainly i think of that background will see it in yet differently. First on the economic front he confronted a Dot com bust which effectively became a inventory industry crash, he dealt with the assaults of 9-11, and he had to handle the worst hurricane disaster in American background all of those weren't his fault however the economic equipment has been good thinking the particularly some selection of issues that he confronted. this would not mean that each and every ingredient is nice yet there have been a number of issues. The Iraq conflict is the present aim of Liberal Bashing and that's tough situations genuine now yet fulfillment remains conceivable and that's going to be what makes or brakes his presidency. undergo in thoughts on a similar time as human beings talk approximately Japan and Germany as fulfillment thoughts we are nevertheless there and up till the ninety's we had much greater troops in Germany than we ever had in Iraq. Iraq is likewise basically one piece of an more desirable conflict which will could be dealt with by utilising the subsequent president no remember what their modern-day place is.
2016-11-24 21:13:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by mendelson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He actually didn't do anything with it. Congress had already indicated America's interest in joining the protocol with their 95-0 vote against it a couple of years before Bush was elected. Bush rightly chose to accept that vote as America's position on the matter.
2007-05-18 01:17:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by thegubmint 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The United States (U.S.), although a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol, has neither ratified nor withdrawn from the Protocol. The signature alone is symbolic, as the Kyoto Protocol is non-binding on the United States unless ratified
2007-05-18 01:07:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justified 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
C-He took America out of it.
2007-05-18 01:03:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by courage 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Told them to ignore it and not to participate.
2007-05-18 01:05:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by jay_d_skinner 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
c-another good decision, that was highly unpopular. boy, sometimes doing the right thing will bite you in the butt!
2007-05-18 01:07:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by daddio 7
·
0⤊
1⤋