It is very insulting to the others who risk their lives. Yeah danger is everywhere, for any soldier.
2007-05-18 00:49:19 · 9 answers · asked by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
It's not Harry's fault - he wants to go. the problem is that Iraqi's have said 'we will target him,' thus putting the people he works with in unnecessary danger.
However, I do agree that, if he isn't going to fight, why give him all that training? Why not train him up in something he can actually do. It's not insulting, but it's a waste of the taxpayer's money.
2007-05-18 00:56:34 · answer #1 · answered by wizard bob 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First, it wasn't Prince Harry's decision not to go to Iraq. He wanted to go and fight with his troops.
Putting a celebrity, or in this case royalty, into a battle zone only increases the chances of attack, ambush and kidnapping. Especially since the media has been so forthcoming with the information about what zone he'll be in and what his troop is. It's not going to take a criminal mastermind to find him there now.
The whole idea now is to try to protect the other troops as much as possible, not invite terrorists into camp!! Yes danger is everywhere for any soldier - but why put 30 people at a higher risk because of 1?
That's why on USO tours with celebrities and such the location isn't disclosed until the last minute if at all. Or even when the President or Vice President visit Iraq, they don't announce it months ahead of time, with the location of where they will be staying - flight information - or the duration of the stay. It's about safety for all concerned, not just the one person.
2007-05-18 01:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by Shawna H 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes danger is everywhere for any soldier but more so for prince harry. It's not just Harry's live that would be in danger but the other soldiers to. As they try and target harry he'd be puting the rest of them in more danger then they need to be.
But i don't know why they train him they could of worked this out before.
And if it was up to prince harry he'd go but it's not in hes control.
2007-05-18 04:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by no1shylass 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's being a sturdy soldier, and no sturdy soldier does his pastime to be a "hero." They do it because it truly is in simple terms what they're experienced to do. yet on the turn aspect of that, he could recognize that his being there is purely going to get his united states of america better excited a pair of conflict thata wouldn't have befell firstly. it truly is purely a count of time in the previous he's captured or killed, and then what's going to happen? His united states of america will almost be compelled to retaliate if he's killed, or sink all of their efforts into rescuing him at the same time as he's captured. there'll be video clips and taped pleas, a twin of the different hostage. His going there's a lack of existence desire, and it truly is irresponsible for a member of the royal kin to placed himself, and consequently his united states of america, in such an no longer conceivable position.
2016-11-04 08:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone knows that he wanted to go, but was not allowed to. Which is the right decision. His presence would have put his comrades in more danger than they already would be. He's probably pretty p i s s e d that he can't go.
2007-05-18 01:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wanted to go,but the Military advised against it,so its probably best for all concerned that he stays home..
2007-05-18 01:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He wanted to go but the milatary said he would B a target.
2007-05-18 00:55:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If i heard the news right, he wanted to go, but the Military believes that he would be targeted to be killed or kidnapped.
2007-05-18 00:53:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
damn, i heard he was going to get sniped
2007-05-18 00:54:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋