It says in the bible he took two animals of every kind, one male and one female. It's doesn't specify the age of the creatures in question, they could have been very little at the time, and 40 days would hardly be long enough for them to become full-grown.
2007-05-17 15:43:39 · 7 answers · asked by Kael 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Carbon dating and fossil records...
If we are to beleive that dinosaurs were on the ark and the ark is a true story where are the fossil records indicating dinosaurs were around at the time the ark was supposed to be around..
According to the story of Noah it rained for 40 days then after a time a bird was sent out (a raven) the raven returned without indication of dry land.. More time and another bird (a dove) was sent out and brought back indication of dry land... Meaning Noah was on the Ark far more than 40 days...
Why don't you work on your knowledge of Noah's story before branching out to figure out what species of animal were on the ark..
Why oh why can't beleivers in the bible know the words there in before making fools of themselves..
2007-05-17 15:57:18 · answer #1 · answered by Diane (PFLAG) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I’ve helped answer something like this previously for somebody, however the question didn’t touch on the dinosaurs. nevertheless the innovations are an identical while you're extremely searching for solutions. The account of Noah’s ark and the Flood as preserved interior the Bible, nevertheless in keeping with real activities and actual human beings, become on no account meant by using the writers to be taken as literal background. mutually as on the instant we’ll document important activities with appropriate representation mutually with in a television information checklist, interior the primeval international of Mesopotamia while it got here to writing a theological rationalization of something, that variety of objectivity become no longer employed. The account of Noah and the flood become more desirable employing the variety of writing, and the present version we've in our Bibles is the top results of two self reliant sources being intertwined. because of the fact the ancients have been extra inquisitive approximately explaining “why” there become a flood instead of “what” composed the form, you may no longer take the important factors of the story on face fee. in reality, the unique writers counted on it. by using writing imprecise or perhaps impossible info, the writers have been telling their objective audience that the sacred truths of the story required us to look previous the undemanding descriptions. in accordance to the final chronologies, no dinosaurs would have been around in Noah’s day, and since the Bible isn't a background e book or e book of technological know-how, this type of literary device makes that is impossible to tell from the Bible checklist which animals have been easily included interior the historic adventure on which the Biblical tale relies.
2016-12-29 09:27:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many Bible scholars believe Noah had Dinos on the ARk.
2007-05-17 15:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by mxcardinal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dinosaurs existed along side man? Thank you, this is all kinds of news to me.
2007-05-17 15:49:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God break their heads on the water.
pslm 74:13
2007-05-17 16:10:16 · answer #5 · answered by Mosa A 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was probably quoting Jerry Falwell.
2007-05-17 15:51:19 · answer #6 · answered by S K 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really so he has a freaking kennel on his paddle boat. Cool
2007-05-17 15:47:27 · answer #7 · answered by Snooter McPrickles 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋