English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

You are entirely justified in your inferiority complex..........Nuf Said

2007-05-17 15:06:41 · answer #1 · answered by Elo Fudpucker 5 · 0 0

How such a number of answerers could be so oblivious to the genuinely meaning of words is spectacular. First, a picture, likeness, reflection (no remember how suited) remains purely a picture - - it is no longer the genuine ingredient. it is no longer even equivalent to the genuine ingredient. Jesus is obviously defined as a separate person from God at Col a million:15. 2nd, prototokos ("first-born"), actually capacity "born first" - see youthful's Analytical Concordance - or good's Exhaustive Concordance. the recent testomony interior the King James version and maximum different trinitarian translations use this meaning for the time of. using the notice prototokos interior the Bible continually capacity one that has come into existence first in time - till now each and every of something of his "brothers" - the beginning up (arkhe) of his father's inventive (or procreative) works. - see pp. seventy seven-88 in Dr. Jason BeDuhn's certainty in Translation, college Press of u . s . a ., 2003. yet some trinitarians nevertheless insist that the Biblical use of the Greek prototokos can, now and returned, propose "pre-eminent" as a results of fact they dare no longer admit the glaring, genuine, literal meaning of Col. a million:15. --------------------------------------... a million John 4:9 additionally words God as a separate person from Jesus (as a brilliant form of scriptures do). additionally, while thinking approximately ANY father and his son, it is no longer frequently referred to as them being co-equivalent and a similar person. So if God and Jesus the two continually existed and are co-equivalent, then it would make no experience for the Bible to confusingly talk of God and Jesus in terms of a relationship between a father and his son. needless to say, the Bible shows that Jesus isn't God, yet particularly is (no longer purely the Son of the father, yet) "the Son OF God (a separate person)".

2016-11-24 20:27:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The true son of God is Jesus. God can't have sex anyway because he is a spirit. But in order for Jesus to be born he sent his messenger angel (Gabriel) to tell Mary that she was going to be pregnant with the son of God.

2007-05-17 15:34:38 · answer #3 · answered by cookies2elmo 1 · 0 1

God had sex with no one. Mary had Jesus placed in her womb (by God). And Jesus was the son of God.

2007-05-17 15:15:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. Jesus was and they were the same, adding of course the Holy Spirit. Everyone is entitled to to, but some will never receive it. They are normally referred to as Gentiles, but I am spreading the word they are the self-deified. Read your State Constitution, maybe the first page might help.
2. The second question regarding sex is irrelevant. The worst is carnal knowledge, which equates to moral philosophy of Homosexual groups devoted to unworthy causes, which may be called chauvinists or special interests demanding special laws for their mutual benefit.

2007-05-17 15:19:38 · answer #5 · answered by Charles P 1 · 0 1

God didn't need anything. God didn't even need a womb to create Adam and Eve. So Mary was chosen because she was in the line of David and a virgin, as was prophecied, and so God used her womb by placing Jesus there. It's not the typical way things are done on Earth, but I think that's the point!

2007-05-17 15:06:14 · answer #6 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 1 3

Um he didnt have sex with anyone he placed a baby in Marys womb. He just placed a baby in there...no sexual relationship.

2007-05-17 15:06:51 · answer #7 · answered by this is me.... 2 · 1 0

Its called immaculate conception. You should read the story in the Bible about the birth of Jesus.

2007-05-17 15:06:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

He didn't have sex with anyone. He made Jesus and lived through him.

2007-05-17 15:06:38 · answer #9 · answered by SDC 5 · 1 1

He didn't. Jesus was a test tube baby.

2007-05-17 15:04:07 · answer #10 · answered by Sneaky Shoelace 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers