1. If Dawkins exists why doesn't he show himself to me?
2. Dawkins has done nothing for me
3. There is so much evil in the world
4. Alot of his followers are hypocrits.
5. Everything we know about him was written by men.
6. Personall experience doesn't make it true. So people who had experiences with Dawkins don't count.
7. Dawkins books were obviously written by his followers. To say that "dawkins did it" is foolishness.
2007-05-17 13:14:11 · 19 answers · asked by NONAME 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
LOL any arguements against my claims?
2007-05-17 13:15:26 · update #1
Any video evidence was made using
computer graphics by hios followers to fool us.
2007-05-17 13:19:17 · update #2
Touche!
2007-05-17 13:17:18 · answer #1 · answered by Christmas Light Guy 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
1. Because Dawkins does not claim he will. Your god does.
2. He doesn't say he will. Again, your god does.
3. Dawkins does not claim to be omnipotent, as well as benevolent.
4. I wasn't aware he had followers.
5. Because he is a man. I have never seen him claim to be some divine Sky Daddy.
6. Personal experience isn't what's debated, it's validity of what was occurring during the experience [Drugs, oxygen deficiency, etc]
7. The authorship, and library of Congress records say otherwise.
2007-05-17 20:20:15 · answer #2 · answered by Squishy Mckay 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nice point, this argument reminds me of experts talking about Cleopatra. She reigned close to the time of Christ, and there is hardly any information written about her, but "experts" claim that she was beautiful, very intelligent, spoke multiple languages, and was a strong leader. Now how do we really know that? But people will take that 2000 year old information to the bank and yet, reject everything written about Jesus who walked the earth about the same time she did.
2007-05-21 15:51:06 · answer #3 · answered by Malaika 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dawkins' non-existence would be far more remarkable than his existence, so we're justified in believing he exists. The reverse is true for gods.
2007-05-17 20:21:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's video evidence documenting his existence. I hope you don't think that you are coming off as clever.
Besides, your claims 1, 2, and 3 only matter to a being who claims that he is omnipresent, omnipotent, and ambivalent. Dawkins has not claimed these, while your God has, at least in your stories.
2007-05-17 20:17:46 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Convincing argument.
2007-05-17 20:18:40 · answer #6 · answered by Southern Apostolic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Replace every "Dawkins" with "Riku" and I can show you don't exist.
2007-05-17 20:20:08 · answer #7 · answered by OMG! PANCAKES LOLz! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what if he really didnt exist and was just some made up guy to gain control of all the atheists?
2007-05-17 20:17:25 · answer #8 · answered by the hamburglar 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean, everything we know about him was written by men??? HE IS STILL ALIVE and living his life!!! Go up and talk to him...
2007-05-20 20:17:53 · answer #9 · answered by kylie e 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is scientifically impossible to prove that anything DOESN'T exist. Nice try, though.
2007-05-17 20:20:33 · answer #10 · answered by kyralan 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋