English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do they have any plan or they just want to win the election?

2007-05-17 10:04:17 · 17 answers · asked by zac 1 in Politics & Government Military

17 answers

Pee their pants and hide under their desks. That's what democrats always do. Democrats are too cowardly to actually defend their country and they resent those of us who did serve in the military.

2007-05-17 10:08:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

They will say that the fact that the troops were there aggrivated the attack, should another one happen.

They will completely ignore the fact that it was an attack that sparked the conflict in the first place.

We got attacked in 2001 because Bill Clinton systematically dismantled the CIA, and almost did the same thing to the military. Because of that we did not have the intelligence to handle the situation before it even happened.

So basically if the troops are pulled out and something goes South they will redirect the blame back on someone else. As I stated before I think they will attempt to say that our presence in Iraq caused more attacks, therefore the blame will be shifted back on the republicans if people actually buy their ********.

The sad thing is that people will most likely believe them. It will most likely take more attacks on US soil to get normal Americans to actually want to do what is needed to handle the whole situation with the Middle East and Islamic fundamentalism.

2007-05-17 10:57:54 · answer #2 · answered by h h 5 · 0 0

The democrats don't have a game plan for tomorrow let alone, when the boys come marching home!

It's impossible to comprehend that every democrat in Congress feels the same way, that the troops should be withdrawn. So, that means they're playing politics. They are putting politics ahead of the security of our troops and our country.

Whatever happened to the real statesmen in Washington? Guys like Everett Dirkson, Adali Stevenson, Paul Douglas, these were politicians who put the country first, their party second !

To this current crop of sleaze, it's all about winning, and they will say anything and do anything to make sure this happens. Everything, except win the war, that is !

2007-05-17 10:37:16 · answer #3 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 1 0

No Plan...they created 911. the experts say;
A U.S. troop pullout from Iraq would leave the country as a potent launchpad for international terrorism and Washington would be forced to go back in within a couple of years, a leading al Qaeda expert said on Tuesday.

2007-05-17 10:35:06 · answer #4 · answered by pooI m 1 · 0 0

Let me ask you another question. What is George Bush going to do if we are attacked while he's still engaged in his charade in Iraq? It certainly isn't going to make him look like he's doing a very good job protecting the country now, is it? In fact, it will make his entire plan of defense into a house of cards. Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, warrant-less wiretaps, extraordinary renditions --- they will all be a failure. The fact is that such attacks could come at any time, whether we are in Iraq or not, and being there is no guarantee they won't happen. And George Bush being in the Whtie House is definitely no guarantee they won't happen.

2007-05-17 10:24:04 · answer #5 · answered by MathBioMajor 7 · 1 0

won't be by iraqi's, hunt down the terrorists that bush forgot about while playing empire builder in iraq. Both spain and england terror attacks were by homegrowns instigated by war. You caused them and were doing nothing to prevent them. The last plot uncovered here was found by FBI, nothing to do with pacifying iraq.

2007-05-17 10:10:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It all depend on if its a dem congress or republican , dems will raise taxes and take away rights of citizens turning us into a police state , republicans will sacrifice more american solders in more war.

2007-05-17 10:15:57 · answer #7 · answered by johnywinslow 3 · 1 1

They'll consult with Rosie O. She'll have the answer.

2007-05-17 10:44:25 · answer #8 · answered by Michael C 3 · 1 0

Blame Bush somehow.

2007-05-17 10:08:01 · answer #9 · answered by only p 6 · 4 1

They'll say the troops were tired and that is why this wasn't prevented.

2007-05-17 10:08:31 · answer #10 · answered by mikehunt29 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers