What's the difference between judging and forming an opinion?

Answer 1

Judging is a form of an opinion (e.g. I am of the opinion the person x is evil). Judging is an opinion about the moral character of another person or group.

Answer 2

In my opinion, judging is weighing the facts and coming to a conclusion and forming an opinion it more of a person call.
Using the word judging implies there is a balance of fairness, you decide based on the evidence provided come to a balanced evaluation. Forming an opinion is influenced by your person beliefs. That is how I would look at it.

Answer 3

To Be A Judge, this is definition of a judge. You have to have a solid rule or law to be able to give an accurate opinion on. Judging is based on facts. To judge and compare to something that has foundation. I f you just giving opinion this is not a foundation unless your opinion is based on a law law set . Big differance between following a law or an opinion. Law is set opinion is self. This is why bible says do NOT JUDGE because the law has been set to walk in LOVE. Opinion assumes and the law can kill with NO MERCY. In a court a Judge cant judge by their opinion but by the book . So let us becareful and understand the differance....Mine is not an opinion but FACTS.

1.a public officer authorized to hear and decide cases in a court of law; a magistrate charged with the administration of justice.
2.a person appointed to decide in any competition, contest, or matter at issue; authorized arbiter: the judges of a beauty contest.
3.a person qualified to pass a critical judgment: a good judge of horses.
4.an administrative head of Israel in the period between the death of Joshua and the accession to the throne by Saul.
5.(especially in rural areas) a county official with supervisory duties, often employed part-time or on an honorary basis.

Answer 4

To judge is to form an estimate of someone's self-worth.

An opinion is a generally held view that lacks strong or positive knowledge about a person or matter.

Opinions usually form the basis of judgements as more data or information becomes available.

Answer 5

Everyone has an opinion. It doesn't have to have any basis. It's usually a knee-jerk attitude toward something or someone. A judgment is derived from examining the issue and forming a conclusion based on the examination of fact or evidence to fact.

Answer 6

example: I read Memories of My Meloncholy Whores by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

emotionally I judge the main character as a sick twisted pervert cause he is 90 years old and hires a 14 year old virgin,prostitute.

critically I think and form an opinion that love is sacred even if one finds it in a whore house cause the dirty old man doesnt have sex with her, enjoys life more, and forgives

Answer 7

In Biblical terms "judging" usually is meant the judgement of ones salvation, which is not for us to determine.
An "opinion" , we all have, about issues and people. Totally different than "judging" ones salvation.

Answer 8

Not much, unless the former is taken to connote personal condemnation, of some sort. But even then, people have no problem judging the Nazis, even while maintaining a policy of not judging others. It is mostly a red herring.

Answer 9

Which verb you employ could no longer be the element. the element is that there are particular issues you may choose and a few issues you may no longer. you may choose a individual's strikes as solid or undesirable, perfect suited or incorrect. you additionally can choose a individual as a foul individual if he continuously does undesirable issues, as a results of fact we are what we do, we exhibit our character in maximum cases in our strikes. What you may no longer choose is the state of that individual's soul at any given 2d. you may on no account choose that he is going to hell, or that he's previous reform, or that he's a worse individual than you're. considering which you won't be able to ascertain that in case you went via each and everything he went via, you does not do an identical issues he has finished. so which you may desire to desire for him and desire that he will replace, insofar as his strikes coach that he's a foul individual. by potential of an identical token, you're below no criminal accountability to be acquaintances with him, or to enable him out of penitentiary, as a results of fact even in spite of the undeniable fact that he could be ready to reform, you don't be attentive to while or if it is extremely going to take place.

Answer 10

The only difference is the person convinces himself that he/she is not the hypocrite by forming the opinion.

A person who judges admits they are forming an opinion which is against the bible teachings.