Hate to say it, but if you are an officer, owner, or check signer, you are a responsible person in the IRS's eyes. I have included a link to explain "responsible person".
2007-05-17 03:39:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have heard that even the person that is responsible for stamping and mailing the payroll tax deposits are considered responsible persons by the IRS.
I don't know if that is true, but I shows the IRS doesn't fool around with trustee taxes (like payroll taxes)
2007-05-17 13:28:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mark S 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
In the IRS's screwed up world, you can be held responsible for the taxes (and to the bank) if you were an authorized signatory on the checking account.
This is why I NEVER sign payroll checks, or payroll tax forms. I let the bosses do it. Even now, working in my husband's corporation I do not sign payroll, ever.
And if I do sign a non-payroll check, I sign his name like this
Joe Blow, Pres by gem.
Good luck
2007-05-17 10:02:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gem 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Company officers and the person responsible for the payment of the taxes.
2007-05-17 09:55:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bostonian In MO 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=108357,00.html
See the 5th bullet point. I think it applies to you.
2007-05-17 10:43:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wayne Z 7
·
1⤊
0⤋