English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Hate to say it, but if you are an officer, owner, or check signer, you are a responsible person in the IRS's eyes. I have included a link to explain "responsible person".

2007-05-17 03:39:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I have heard that even the person that is responsible for stamping and mailing the payroll tax deposits are considered responsible persons by the IRS.

I don't know if that is true, but I shows the IRS doesn't fool around with trustee taxes (like payroll taxes)

2007-05-17 13:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by Mark S 5 · 0 1

In the IRS's screwed up world, you can be held responsible for the taxes (and to the bank) if you were an authorized signatory on the checking account.

This is why I NEVER sign payroll checks, or payroll tax forms. I let the bosses do it. Even now, working in my husband's corporation I do not sign payroll, ever.

And if I do sign a non-payroll check, I sign his name like this
Joe Blow, Pres by gem.

Good luck

2007-05-17 10:02:35 · answer #3 · answered by Gem 7 · 0 1

Company officers and the person responsible for the payment of the taxes.

2007-05-17 09:55:39 · answer #4 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0 1

http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=108357,00.html

See the 5th bullet point. I think it applies to you.

2007-05-17 10:43:01 · answer #5 · answered by Wayne Z 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers