If you really cared, you'd put up some money for health care and college tuition for all those unwanted babies. Plus some money for welfare cheese for the mom. Plus plus you wouldn't be sending those saved kids to perform late late late term abortions on people who don't share your religion.
2007-05-17 02:44:42 · 9 answers · asked by Potatoe Plague 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"God" makes tons of new babies every day. Sometimes he doesn't want them and aborts them himself. But he calls it a miscarriage.
2007-05-17 02:52:33 · update #1
It is a big misnomer, because they'll probably end up being shot in a drug war after 18 years at the public teat.
2007-05-17 02:47:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What makes you think we don't? We have many programs to help women after they give birth...we help with child care, clothing, cribs, car seats, health care, rides to and from doctor appointments...the list goes on and on.
We also help the homeless, the poor, give clothing, run soup kitches...again...and endless list. Why would you think differently? Who do you think runs these programs and donates to them?
A miscarriage is different...it is not caused by someone to end a pregnancy. It is a natural occurance. It is not the murder of an unwanted but the death of a person who cannot otherwise live. Much like those that die of natural causes after birth.
Your last comment I dont' get... "plus you wouldn't be sending those saved kids to perform late late late term abortions on people who don't share your religion." What do you mean by this? It' doesn't make sense. What saved kids are we sending to perform late term abortions?
2007-05-17 09:55:15 · answer #2 · answered by Misty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pro-Life isnt a misnomer but "Planned-Parenthood" is
Parenthood was something obviously not planned on.
Hey Nubilin.. why should "WE" provide you or anyother woman or man with birthcontrol pills or condoms? There are plenty of free government programs for pre-natal and post natal care and assistance for women with your mind set.
Umm of course that kind of thinking leads me to believe the idea of a father being involved isnt an option. That should have been thought of before hand. Of course it's always someone elses fault
Fred, you are wrong. Casual, promiscuous sex is a cause of alot of broken hearts, diseases, displaced families, broken homes, depression, emotional baggage, suicides, and the list goes on and on.
\Do you have any more tidbits of wisdom for the teenagers and others reading this?
2007-05-17 09:54:22 · answer #3 · answered by beingbad67 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love the bumper stickers that say "God is Pro Life"
Please! After the genocide at Sodom and Gomorrah, the Plague of the first born and that peevish little incident where David counted heads instead of coins.... Which God are they talking about?
2007-05-17 10:05:08 · answer #4 · answered by bountifiles 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I said earlier, it's about punishing the woman for being "promiscuous." They don't care about providing women with pre-natal or post-natal care. They are not willing to support her or the baby. Once it's born, it has no rights and she has none anyway.
Also, many don't want to take the appropriate steps to preventing unwanted pregnancy by providing everyone with easy access to contraception. They want to drill abstinence-only education into horny teenagers.
2007-05-17 09:54:33 · answer #5 · answered by Bipolar Bear 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Everyone knows that christians have sexual hangups. Look at catholic priests if you need any more evidence. Therefore, when news of people having sex reaches others' awareness, they want to control those peoples' lives. Pro-life is a christian euphemism for anti-freedom.
2007-05-17 10:15:56 · answer #6 · answered by Fred 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would, but I'm busy providing health care and education for illegal immigrants.
2007-05-17 11:15:27 · answer #7 · answered by Evan S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
baby versus buck???..hhmm...
Babies are disposable but money isnt?
2007-05-17 09:48:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
not a question
2007-05-17 09:48:03 · answer #9 · answered by Clawndike 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋