English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Athiests/Agnostics/Non-Religious/FSMs, what's your favorite refutation of said arguments?

2007-05-16 21:06:53 · 9 answers · asked by Tree Hugger 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

in other words, athiests, agnostics, etc. what are your favorite arguments to refute and how do you refute them?

2007-05-16 21:11:18 · update #1

9 answers

If anyone uses proof and god in the same sentence, it is almost not worth bothering.

You can not prove god. If you want to argue your faith, don't say you have proof of anything.

2007-05-16 21:22:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

My favorite argument, though it's by no means hard "proof" (I don't believe there is such a thing) is the fact that it's a mathematical impossibility that all the elements that converged to create life did so by accident. The odds against our existence are astronomical. It NEVER should have happened!

Our DNA is too elaborate to have been a cosmic accident, and life does not come out of non-life. Matter is not created from anti- or non-matter. That is a scientific impossibility.

I have more, but as far as science (which is NOT my best subject) goes, that's about the extent of it.

I would, however, like to add that absolutely NO archaeological evidence has disproved even one event recorded in the Bible.

2007-05-16 21:15:02 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 4 1

that's impossible to disprove Christianity... and people i be attentive to contain going to furnish the finished " you particularly have your faith crap and that's not stable sufficient"... why not? why isnt it stable sufficient? i like how one guy or female commented at precise right here putting forward that Christians are retarded and what not, jointly as in certainty Christians are lots of the best optimal clever people on the face of the earth... on a facet word: there became into an avid atheist who became to Jesus Christ and faith in God simply by complicated make of the attention! study those scientific guidance: the attention is so complicated and state-of-the-artwork that there is basically one probability in 10 to the 78th capacity that any 2 people might have a similar features. It wouuld take a minimum of one hundred years of Cray super-computer time to simulate what happens indoors the attention each 2d. the attention can distinguish hundreds of thousands of colors and colorations. you're telling me that something like that, that is just one portion of the human physique, there are a great sort of selection areas with a great purchase greater suitable complicated products to it which i ought to coach besides, in case you mandatory me too... you're telling me there isn't any God... Hmm... you shield believing that bud... source(s): William Paley... super guy

2016-11-23 19:56:51 · answer #3 · answered by nageotte 4 · 0 0

Faith is the opposite of proof.

Logic is the best refutation of the concept of an omniscient/omnipresent being. That is in logic contradictions cannot and do not exist. (Only men create contradictions and can maintain them only by the use of force.)

"An atom is itself, and so is the universe; neither can contradict its own identity; nor can a part contradict the whole."

A consciousness with nothing to be conscious of is a contradiction. ie. Before God allegedly created something, what was he conscious of?

2007-05-16 21:21:24 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Wizard 4 · 0 1

Throw away your wallet. Rub yourself with dirt. Walk along the highway. God exists within some people, and the altruistic kindness of strangers is the best proof that I have seen.

2007-05-16 21:23:13 · answer #5 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 0 1

A baby in it's mothers womb perfectly formed. How do all the parts go into the right place? A creator had to form the baby.

For example:

It's like this....... you take a cake mix - throw it in a bowl and put eggs oil & water in it and wait for it to make itself. It doesn't. it can't. There has to be a creator

2007-05-16 21:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by Kaliko 6 · 3 1

I believe in God because of the hard evidence he exists: in the order, beauty, complexity and harmony of nature and the universe, man's superior intelligence and moral conscience. Is it possible for all these to have happened by chance? Not a chance!
Albert Einstein wrote in his book "The World As I See It" that the harmony of natural law "Reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."
He went on to write, "Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe--a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble."
A very significant statement, wouldn't you say?

But the most incontrovertible proof God exists is no other than Jesus Christ, the Word of God who became flesh and the REVEALER of God. Jesus was sent by his Father not only to redeem mankind. He was also sent to prove God exists. What human can …

Silence a typhoon?
Walk on water?
Multiply a few loaves of bread and fish in order to feed a multitude of 5,000?
Bring dead people back to life?
Give sight to people born blind?
Change water into wine?
Rise from the dead?

These miracles prove beyond any reasonable doubt that God exists. They demonstrate Christ's power over life and death and the forces of nature. Only a person empowered by God can have such powers.

And if these miracles were just made up, Christianity would not have grown rapidly in the first century. His disciples would not have risked their lives for a bunch of lies. But more than anything else, it was the resurrection of Jesus, which convinced the early Christians to stand for their faith. The resurrection of Jesus could not be silenced because more than 500 people saw his resurrected body. (1 Corinthians 15,6)

May the Lord's peace be with you!

2007-05-16 21:22:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

We don't like to argue

2007-05-16 21:34:08 · answer #8 · answered by Kristenite’s Back! 7 · 0 1

There is no proof either way.

2007-05-16 21:13:26 · answer #9 · answered by Daisy Indigo 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers