YES OR NO ???????
optional information
((There's about 20million+/- here, given amnesty, they'll bring their families, so you're talking about 100-120million more people pretty much overnight. The demographics of the US would change instantly. Is this what you want (because that's what "amnesty" will do). They will soon be demanding social security benefits, etc., so you can kiss yours goodbye.
Well, don't want to bias you...))
Do you want amnesty for illegals??
2007-05-16 20:44:52 · 27 answers · asked by SQD 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-05-18 19:55:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thanks to the government, I've ALREADY lost my social security benefits, and it had NOTHING to do with immigration. I guarantee I've been paying into it ALLOT longer than you have.
Having lived in San Diego, working full time WITHOUT medical benefits, I can tell you it was allot easier for them to see a doctor than it was for me.
Reality check, They already have amnesty in a number of cities throughout the country.
There is no woe is me for the agricultural industry who has always broken the law and hired illegals to pick the crops. I'll pay an extra $1 a pint for strawberries. AND I'll pay tax on it.
I'm a hardliner who wants to see the rules we already have enforced.
No, I don't agree with amnesty, but I also don't agree with the hate and anger that's being thrown about on either side of this issue. It's not accomplishing anything.
2007-05-17 00:15:58 · answer #2 · answered by FieryOutlaw 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No whilst amnesty became into given the 1st time there have been approximately 3 million illegals interior the country. That became into meant to remedy the situation! Now there are approximately 12-20 million unlawful immigrants interior the country. It did not remedy the situation then (infact, it made it worse) and it won't remedy the situation now.
2016-11-04 05:01:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I do not.
But this poll doesn't matter anyway, our "vote" doesn't mean anything.
Our elected officials are the ones that should be "polled" since they are the ones with the power to decide. Those opposing...and they are a majority int he U.S. should put pressure on their elected officials to do what's right...and not grant amnesty to illegal aliens.
No illegal alien that broke the law should be granted citizenship AHEAD of those immigrating here legally, many of whom are still in the process.
2007-05-17 01:34:50 · answer #4 · answered by Geno 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO!!! Deportation!!! They go back Anchor babies need to go back too. Anchor babies can return to the us when they turn 18, seeing as they are US citizen. But Being a US citizen doesn't mean a person has to be raised in the United States. The government should have DNA stored for each anchor baby. DNA samples are still cheaper then paying 18 years of welfare and health care benefits.
2007-05-16 22:12:31 · answer #5 · answered by wondermom 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not in this lifetime.
Can America deport nearly every illegal within 2 months as President Eisenhower did in 1954? Si su puede!!!
2007-05-17 21:08:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Simple answer: NO
Has everyone forgotten the promises made about the last amnesty?
2007-05-16 22:36:08 · answer #7 · answered by Gary M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How are the demographics going to change if they ALREADY are here? Is that your biggest fear, different demographics?
We can only speculate on how many will bring other family members and if that is even ALLOWED in the plan.
I already know I will probably not get SS benefits when I retire so I have begun a 401k a while back.
Oh and yes I want amnesty and your bias did not affect me.Thanks.
2007-05-16 21:01:33 · answer #8 · answered by Psi Chi member 3 · 1⤊ 6⤋
No because there is an estimated 10-15 million illegals who would be eligible for social security. Right now, the social security system can't handle another 10-15 million people who have never contributed.
2007-05-16 20:51:28 · answer #9 · answered by I am Jesus 1 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No
I would prefer to loosen immigration laws to permit more immigrants into the country legally (I'm personally willing to allow any would-be immigrant who is willing to work and isn't a criminal to immigrate here).
To grant amnesty to illegals would be a mistake. It would also be a mistake to allow immigrants into the country and then give them welfare (which should be either eliminated or limited to citizens).
2007-05-16 21:03:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
no. when i was working in the early 80s i remember an older woman saying her brother worked with the stoke exchange, she said he told her when people my age get ready to retire there will be nothing there. we can kiss our sweet azzes good bye.
2007-05-16 21:23:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋