No because Jesus is the Creator of the Universe and all Science proves this to be so and that the Bible is the Word of God.
2007-05-16 17:06:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Apostle Jeff 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Easy: I don't accept Jewish fairy tales. Religion and science don't mix anyway; one is based on "faith" and the other can be directly observed (like gravity, or that atoms exist).
How about this? Here's a simple scientific lab experiment!
You go get 3 professing Christians who believe Jesus is who the Bible says. Now take them to a paraplegic. The Bible says anyone who believes in Jesus can do miracles like raise the dead and perform healings. So, 3 professing, practicing Christians should be able to use the name of Jesus on the paraplegic and heal him or her fully.
Try that, and get back to us all here on what happened.
2007-05-16 17:24:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Easy, NO
No person alive or in the past documented it scientifically, or actually witnessed God say it, that makes it here-say unsubmitable in science. Besides,anything proposed as proof can be contradicted by belief. That is philosophy.
Science is based on facts,proofs, knowledge, and observation, you are asking a religious based philosophy question.
I think you are asking if you can crap on someones beliefs, justify it by articulately debating it, that would be a yes; but you earn the New York salute for it, and the title of A55hole just for asking!!!!!
2007-05-16 17:18:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by wfoxdallas 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientifically, a human cannot be raised from the dead, at least not during that time period in the manner as which it is described.
Scientifically, a human cannot perform the miracles Jesus supposedly performed.
Scientifically, a human cannot be born of a virgin without artificial insemination, and for some reason, I doubt that's how Jesus was conceived.
Scientifically, I could go on.
2007-05-16 17:07:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
It does not make sense to answer science questions with religious answers. Equally true, it does not make sense to answer religious questions with scientific answers. Examples: Why does man exist? Science cannot answer this question. Religion can answer the question, though. How old is modern man? Religion cannot answer this question but science can. Does it make sense to you now?
2007-05-16 17:05:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by 12th 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Easy answer. You were lied to. Jesus was a "savior" but not a savior of "souls" he was a savior of slavery. Jesus was an anti-slavery activist who created an anti-slavery organization that plagued the Roman nobility until 313AD. The word "savior" meant he saved people from slavery. His organization assisted slaves to escape to beyond the Roman frontier. "Jesus saves" was a similar expression that meant the same thing. This organization's influence grew so great and dangerous to the nobility (slavemasters) that they made Jesus the deity of their new slave control organization called "christianity" and tricked the anti-slavery organization into disbanding thinking they had won because the slaves were converted to serfs, but in reality, the christian organization was much more successful in controlling the slaves and making them profitable and safe than the nobility and it's military legions had ever been.
The 'bible' is a fictional document that contains the rules for controlling slaves. One of it's requirements is that the slaves not realize that they are slaves.
2007-05-16 17:14:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ho Co D 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes. The scientific way would be to look at the evidence and look at the most probable outcome based on that evidence.
1) The claims made for Jesus were not uncommon to make about people in those days, including healing people, coming back from the dead, and others.
2) There is no evidence that Jesus existed, except for stuff written decades after Jesus supposedly died.
3) Scientific study of human nature shows them to make fantastic claims about people, especially those that live far away or have died. A recent example is stories of Elvis surviving death.
4) Analysis of writings about Jesus show it to be derived from earlier myths and previous common sources.
5) Stories that Jesus supposedly told about himself were written in third person, which is common for people talking about someone, but not talking about themselves.
6) Evidence shows that people tend to make up gods.
7) Evidence shows that people will create whole superstitions around false tales and believe those tales to be true.
8) All religions have histories that indicate they were created by men.
9) No real evidence of any gods exists.
10) All evidence indicates that the mind is a process of the brain, and when it goes, so do we. Look at symptoms of an Alzheimer's person for evidence of this. There is no hard evidence of any souls or afterlife.
So, when you look at the evidence, it makes the idea that Jesus is a savior quite improbable.
2007-05-16 17:00:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
There is no verifiable evidence to support that Jesus was ever real let alone a savior. The bible is not a history book in any way, shape, or form.
2007-05-16 17:06:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Who knew that the earth was round?
It's in the Bible! when the eimpire of false religion was still burning people at the stake just for saying so!
People talk of things they know nothing about...
Josephus was an historian of the day of Jesus and wrote about him. Don't take my word for it but check your local library and see how many worldly historical books speak of Jesus!
He was the Savior but was sent by his Father who cannot and could not and never did die, lie or gave the worship that belongs to Him to any other... not even our king and savior, his son, Christ Jesus! He wants to be worshiped in spirit and in truth... and for us to do that, we must make the effort to truly hear what Jesus is saying... as he said that out of his own initiative, he can do nothing at all... that he does the will of his Father, who sent him... I mean, Jesus, was not the type to lie about such things... and would have never said that his father was the one we had to pray to if it weren't true... that his father's name had to be made known, if he didn't mean the Creator's name which is Jehovah! that he was the king of the Jews, if he was the God of the Jews, and would not have prayed to his father in the heavens if that father was himself... Come on... all of this would make him an idiot and God forbid! He simply loved his father so much that he was willing to die to please him just as Isack pleased his father by allowing him to take his life... and since even Abraham was willing to sacrifice his only begotten son... so was Jehovah in the position of sacrificing his only begotten son when the time came that it was required to save us all... as they both loved us so much, that He gave his only begotten son to die for us... John 3: 16... We must stop doing the will of the evil brother by calling them liars... as only Satan, is the liar!!! John 8: 44.
Archeologists by the hundreds are discovering more and more evidence of the existence of the things quoted in the Bible and for this reason, an increasing number of young men long and study to go in that field... Scientists galore, have no more doubt of the existence of both Jesus and God, the Creator!!! To say otherwise is foolish!!! But no one can force the blind to see!
2007-05-16 17:12:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Terisina 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Using the rules of scientific research Jesus did not exist.
Only faith keeps this religious character from slipping into myth.
It's as simple as that.
2007-05-16 17:03:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Terry 7
·
3⤊
1⤋