it has lack huge fights but its coming back!
2007-05-16 14:33:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by mccormick 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No boxing won't grow to be a ineffective recreation. The UFC difficulty is a fad and could pass away. Boxing gets back as quickly as the super names quit it with the full money difficulty. think of of Rocky Marciano, he would combat everyone basically for the combat, we've human beings like Pacquiao that isn't combat till he gets 60% of the money win or lose. yet another situation is we shop having those boxers from mexico that initiate off professional on the age of 15 by applying the time they arrive over and get a attractiveness for themselves interior the U. S. they retire youthful because of the fact they have already had their share of concussions and scars around the eyes. So we get a warm prospect that places out some super fights yet he's forgotten in some years. I do think of boxing is at a low precise now even though it is going to turn around.money is ruining the sport if boxing is to return back they'd desire to do a 60/40 chop up for ALL combatants. Winners get the 60% and losers get the 40%. it would shop combatants struggling with and preparation.
2016-11-04 04:23:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by dembinski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can find a boxing match on 3 - 4 times a week 52 weeks a year on a variety of different channels. Don't believe me? Check out boxsch.com this is a boxing schedule website. Take into consideration the amount of TV advertising revenue from ESPN Friday-Wednseday night fights, HBO PPV, PPV Boxing, Foxsports, Telefutura, Telemundo, Versus, and MSG, I bet boxing brings in more money then most of the other sports that have limited seasons.
Also what people in the USA don' t realize is that boxing is in its golden age in the UK. Boxing events are selling out football stadiums.
I'm tired of people throwing out names like tyson (who was NEVER a good boxer) Ali, Lewis.... etc. What about the up coming Edison Miranda - Kelley Pavlik fight this weekend? Has anyone seen the fight card?
HBO
Saturday May 19th, 2007
The FedEx Forum, Memphis, TN
--WBC WBO Middleweight Title--
Jermain Taylor (26-0-17 kos) -vs- Cory Spinks (36-3-11 kos)
--WBC Middleweight Title Eliminator--
Edison Miranda (28-1-24 kos) –vs- Kelley Pavlik (30-0-27 kos)
Carlos Baldomir (43-10-6) -vs- Vernon Forrest (38-2)
Andre Berto (17-0) -vs- Martinus Clay (12-14-2)
Jose Navarro (25-2) -vs- Antonio Ramirez (24-15-6)
I mean are you kidding me? This fight card is better then the De La - Mayweather card.
Also this firday:
Friday, May 18th, 2007 Beacon Theatre Manhattan, NYC
--Middleweight--
John Duddy (19-0 15 kos) -vs- Dupre Strickland (18-1- 7 kos)
ESPN2
--Lightweight--
Zahir Raheem (27-2) -vs- Cristobal Cruz (34-10-1)
--Cruiserweight--
Richard Hall (27-6) -vs- Shaun George (13-2-2)
So is boxing dead? Not even close. Is boxing broken? Seems to be working just fine. Just because its not on ABC and Tyson is not crushing someone in 2 rounds does not mean the whole sports is dead.
Boxing has evolved..........
2007-05-17 06:09:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by metaspider 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I used to be a major boxing fan back in the early to late 90's, with fighters like De La Hoya, Roy Jones Jr., Tyson, Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis and many others- I was always looking forward to a great fight.
Now however, where have all these great fighters gone? Better yet, who is now around to replace these guys? I now can name more UFC fighters than boxers because of the growning popularity of the sport. I don't feel Boxing is dead, but as far as right now, it is knocked out!!!
The question now is, will it get up off the canvas and continue to fight, or will it just lay there say to itself, that it had a great run, and made millions of dollars, but it now time to retire?
We will see.
2007-05-16 17:25:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by k_dawg78 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's all about perspective. My friend gets almost every pay per view fight and he gets 20-25 people over around a big screen. We are all huge boxing fans and we talk and debate the sport passionately. We even get fans over for HBO, Showtime, or ESPN fights. It's exciting and really the only thing that gets any more hype is maybe a UNC/Duke basketball game. I think the reality is that fans are mad about the politics involved with boxing. But what sport doesn't money corrupt? Boxing is coming back, just wait.
2007-05-16 14:44:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boxing is not dead. There is a resurgence of this sport in middle and high schools. However, it is a sport with less athletes participating since school administrators view it as a sport that teaches violence rather than teamwork in sports such as football, soccer, and basketball. Boxing in school venues is not sponsored, typically kids join clubs or meet in groups. A key reason it has lost its appeal is due to the rise of ESPN news. ESPN has shown three fights in which boxers have subsequently died due to head injury and inflammation. When kids look at this, they view that it is not worth it. They would rather play basketball, take less of a beating and earn more money. For boxing to emerge as a popular sport again, it will need to revamp its appeal through effective advertising. Additionally, sad as it is for me, a boxing fan to say it, headgear might have to be used. Yet, people have a wrong conception of injuries in boxing. Boxing is actually safer than sports such as football, mountain climbing and parasailing. People just give the sport too much negative appeal and not enough focus on helping people learn to defend themselves as well as learn responsibility and patience.
2007-05-16 15:42:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
boxing is not dead but its very ill...... the main reason for this is that money has surpassed quality as the motivator in matches. Back in the days of the golden era of boxing, it used to be the great fighters fought many times a year including the champs.... they were tested more often...... in those theys they really earned their title.... today most champs are untested among the best... and they dont fight that often.... thats why boxing is ill. I personally have gotten into mma in recent years because its more competitive..... boxing is staying behind... but it still can be saved, we just need some real champs for a change.... the Julio Cesar Chavez's, and Muhamad Ali's of the world....... I am not reffering so much to as talent as to heart.... this two champs had heart of gold and balls of steel... they really epitomze a true champ... they fought to win, as opposed of other current boxers who fight not to lose.
2007-05-16 14:09:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joe 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
curling is dead, table tennis is dead, synchronized self gratification is alive and kicking, the sooner don king gets out of boxing the sooner it will be alive again. best fighters vs best fighters wow what a concept.
2007-05-20 11:44:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by James 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
boxing will never die there are old and young fans everyone likes it but like ive said many times boxing is ruined by heavy prices for the best fights its almost unaccesable for the averge fan. boxing will neve die.
thanks
~josh
PS if any of todays sports of america are going to die i see hockey dying first.
2007-05-16 14:44:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wrestling
2007-05-16 13:58:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Unverified emails 2
·
0⤊
0⤋