If you have a 1 month year old child and you let it starve to death, I would consider you unstable and deem you a threat to society. But if a person had an abortion, are they just as unstable and threatening?
2007-05-16 13:45:43 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i wouldnt trust them to protect my life ... but anyway no ... they just need to make it illegal except in cases of rape or medical threat to the mother ...
2007-05-16 13:48:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
It does the society and the environment more harm to bring another people into this world than to have an abortion. Imagine how much energy a person will use in his life time. God's ways to control human population are war, famine and diseases. All of these are worse than abortion. We really need to control our population, otherwise there will be more wars.
Fifty percent of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. That is natural abortion. If God is behind everything, he is the greatest abortionist.
2007-05-24 17:24:08 · answer #2 · answered by Oliver K 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. It is a woman's basic right to not deliver a baby if she is unable to provide it with the things it needs (parenting/love/financial requirements such as food and shelter) or does not want it.
Focus should be on preventing unwanted pregnancies or creating a society that supports women who need help raising their child.
Besides, would you rather make girls use a knitting needle or coathanger in a bathtub behind a locked door at home?
Legalised abortion allows a safe procedure that prevents destroying and hurting two human bodies instead of only one.
It's a sad truth that we have to be realistic about.
2007-05-16 20:51:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes they are just as dangerous and much more common than infant -starvers. Those who "provide "abortions should be the ones jailed. Doctors who do abortions are hypocrites IMHO because they take the lives of the innocent for money and they know what they are doing.
2007-05-23 18:10:21 · answer #4 · answered by James O 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, because the unstable part comes when they can't control their decisions to chose and make right or wrong decisions on their own. They are chosing what is right for them not the child or even the father and his family.
Yes, it is threatening because having an abortion threatens, and takes the lives of babies.
2007-05-16 20:53:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because there is a law in "Abortion". Ask the Legislators to amend the law so no jailing will be done to those who violate the law.
2007-05-24 02:12:02 · answer #6 · answered by James 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they are trying to prevent that one month old starving to death by not bringing it into the world. Abortion is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS
2007-05-16 20:58:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Until it is born it is just a part of the mother. Jailing those who have abortions is as absurd as jailing those who have amputations.
2007-05-16 20:52:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Im against abortion- but i wouldnt put them in jail
2007-05-16 20:51:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
what i think..
i dont think they should be put in jail
BUT
abortion is murder
as soon as the egg catches on to the spurm and all that stuff it is a living being.
and i dont think they have the right to kill it.
you might say
well.. its the mothers body and she should have the right to do what she wants.
ITS NOT!
its not her body that she is making the decision about. its the baby's its the baby she is killing. not her own!
i could go on for pages. but i think that would be a bit much..
you get my point?
2007-05-16 20:55:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
and what about the terrorist christians who kill abortion clinic doctors, threaten participants, and scream hate and ignorance at them?
after 9/11 suddenly our holy taliban like christians have stopped supporting terror as a weapon against abortion clinics, and shifted to elsewhere
2007-05-16 20:49:33 · answer #11 · answered by voice_of_reason 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋