2007-05-16 11:34:34 · 9 answers · asked by azn-persuazn 3 in Sports ➔ Running
Anything under 70 is good. Under a minute isn't really feasible unless you're really good. I don't thing there was a 400 runner in my league that ran under a minute when I was that age.
2007-05-16 13:27:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say anything sub 70 for a 12 year old is pretty good.
2007-05-16 19:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by Nelson_DeVon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well this is my first year of track...i am 12...but if you are a guy i think guys and girls time varies alot. and i am a girl so yea. i ran a like 1:15 i think. And that is pretty slow. I think as long as you can get it in 1:20 that is pretty good.
GOOD LUCK!
2007-05-16 21:30:58 · answer #3 · answered by m_snyder13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Assuming you're a male 12-year-old (from Avatar), anything sub-minute is pretty good!
2007-05-16 19:07:50 · answer #4 · answered by phillipa_gordon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
under 70 seconds im the fastest 6th grader and i get 1:08 and then closest person to me is 1:18
so under 1:20 would be good
2007-05-16 21:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by kyle g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know a guy that ran it in 56.3 and it was AMAZING but he didn't even place in the top eight at districts..but that was a good time for my school (he was 15 btw)
2007-05-16 20:23:39 · answer #6 · answered by <3 hEy gOrGeOuS <3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, everyone has different limits and such, so as long as you do the best you CAN do, then you should be fine.
2007-05-16 21:47:12 · answer #7 · answered by Hollylylylyly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
55 sec would be amazin
2007-05-16 18:48:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
60 seconds at least.........................................
2007-05-16 19:34:26 · answer #9 · answered by Sarina 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋