harry is third in line to the throne so what's the big deal??
and don't tell me he can't go because of security, he could be sent without blabbing his whereabout's could he not??
what message does this send to the rest of the British military??
and what message does it send to the enemy??
2007-05-16 10:48:52 · 13 answers · asked by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
He could be sent in on special missions, and no one would know where he is from one minute to the next and how would the enemy be anymore dangerous than what they are now??
2007-05-16 11:00:26 · update #1
the ministry of defence has certainly got "egg on its face"
Harry is a trained soldier he is no different to any other guy
that is sent into a war zone . Ask any parent who's son or daughter is out in Iraq or Afghanistan.
2007-05-16 10:57:27 · answer #1 · answered by mickjack 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem is even under the most tight security, there is always a posibility that him being in an area brings the other troops under threat. Be happy that at least he's in the forces. Why can't the Bush Twins or Cheney's girl/boy be in the services? Or for that matter any of the US senators/congressmen? Why won't they volunteer their children on the altar of war?
2007-05-16 10:53:29 · answer #2 · answered by LA Law 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They stated it not only puts Harry in grave danger, but it makes it more dangerous for the rest of his troops. Queen Elizabeth this morning forbid for Harry to go to Iraq. The terrorists had already sent word that he will lose his ears first, they were scoping him out.
I agree that it puts the other troops in a very dangerous situation, about the same if the twins were to go. but you don't have to worry about the twins, they AIN't going and they AIN'T wanting to go. Bush got that base covered, just send your sons and daughters to be slaughtered not mine.
2007-05-16 11:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is cause of secrity tho i personnely dont agree with it i think he should go but i can understand y he is not. they cant keep his whereabouts hidden because of the media they are ***** like. i must admit i am fustrated as i have a special person out there at the moment and his life at risk what ever rank they are. prince harry's head is wanted on a stick, so we can not risk it. he his after all 3rd line to the throne.....
2007-05-16 11:05:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is definitely an issue with security. If he get captured or kidnapped, they could use his status as leverage. If Prince Harry were to be killed, an entire country mourns; that type of effect can cause enemies to target his team or put his team at higher risk.
2007-05-16 10:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by Drake 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He causes a larger threat to those people around him. Remember them? How would you like to serve with someone you knew was a target just because of his last name? Some terrorist will take the whole squad out just to get to him and not give a **** about who else goes down.
2007-05-16 10:54:02 · answer #6 · answered by mav426 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they already said they would be out to get him, this puts him at great risk and all the soldiers in his outfit. Would you like to have your son or daughter fighting next to him knowing everyone in the country were out to get him.
2007-05-16 10:57:55 · answer #7 · answered by ronald r 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His being there will just put the troops in more danger as he will be a target.
2007-05-16 10:55:18 · answer #8 · answered by cheri b 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there shouldnt be a war anyway....
no one should be sent over.
my brother was. twice!
and i just dissagree with it completly, i actually hope no one else has to go over there, he got shot in the neck, and no one should have to go through that!
its STUPID to fight with guns anyways.
2007-05-16 11:00:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason Bush's daughters wouldn't go if we had a draft!!!! Heads-up all you women, the next draft will include us!!!!
2007-05-16 10:53:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋