English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-16 04:37:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Global Warming

11 answers

You may have heard about global warming. It seems that in the last 100 years the earth's temperature has increased about half a degree Celsius. This may not sound like much, but even half a degree can have an effect on our planet. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the sea level has risen 6 to 8 inches (15 to 20 cm) in the last 100 years (see How do they measure sea level?).

This higher temperature may be causing some floating icebergs to melt, but this will not make the oceans rise. Icebergs are large floating chunks of ice. In order to float, the iceberg displaces a volume of water that has a weight equal to that of the iceberg. Submarines use this principle to rise and sink in the water by changing their weight.

But the rising temperature and icebergs could play a small role in the rising ocean level. Icebergs are chunks of frozen glaciers that break off from landmasses and fall into the ocean. The rising temperature may be causing more icebergs to form by weakening the glaciers, causing more cracks and making ice more likely to break off. As soon as the ice falls into the ocean, the ocean rises a little.

If the rising temperature affects glaciers and icebergs, could the polar ice caps be in danger of melting and causing the oceans to rise? This could happen, but no one knows when it might happen.

The main ice covered landmass is Antarctica at the South Pole, with about 90 percent of the world's ice (and 70 percent of its fresh water). Antarctica is covered with ice an average of 2,133 meters (7,000 feet) thick. If all of the Antarctic ice melted, sea levels around the world would rise about 61 meters (200 feet). But the average temperature in Antarctica is -37°C, so the ice there is in no danger of melting. In fact in most parts of the continent it never gets above freezing.

At the other end of the world, the North Pole, the ice is not nearly as thick as at the South Pole. The ice floats on the Arctic Ocean. If it melted sea levels would not be affected.

There is a significant amount of ice covering Greenland, which would add another 7 meters (20 feet) to the oceans if it melted. Because Greenland is closer to the equator than Antarctica, the temperatures there are higher, so the ice is more likely to melt.

But there might be a less dramatic reason than polar ice melting for the higher ocean level -- the higher temperature of the water. Water is most dense at 4 degrees Celsius. Above and below this temperature, the density of water decreases (the same weight of water occupies a bigger space). So as the overall temperature of the water increases it naturally expands a little bit making the oceans rise.

In 1995 the International Panel on Climate Change issued a report which contained various projections of the sea level change by the year 2100. They estimate that the sea will rise 50 centimeters (20 inches) with the lowest estimates at 15 centimeters (6 inches) and the highest at 95 centimeters (37 inches). The rise will come from thermal expansion of the ocean and from melting glaciers and ice sheets. Twenty inches is no small amount -- it could have a big effect on coastal cities, especially during storms.

2007-05-16 04:48:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

The Earth is an eco-system that dependson certain temperatures. As those temperatures change so does the life support system of the planet. The polar ice caps balance with the warmth of the equator.

Just as the distance between the Earth and the Sun makes life on Earth possible, so do the polar ice caps.

Take care,
Troy

2007-05-16 05:43:54 · answer #2 · answered by tiuliucci 6 · 0 0

Because there is enough water stored as ice in the Polar Ice Caps to make half of the world disappear underwater which would cause cramped conditions and most of the animals and wildlife would become extinct that live and survive on ice.

2007-05-16 07:35:12 · answer #3 · answered by Gracie 3 · 0 1

If the Polar Ice Caps melt, then all/most of the coastal states/cities will be under water. If that happens, millions of people out of work and out of jobs and homes, where are they going to go? To the inland states/cities, where we would all become more overcrowded, and jobs and housing would become scarce. Picture New Orleans in the millions, but not able to ever go home...the reprecussions would be felt for years.
And wouldn't all the people who didn't care, or had their heads stuck in the ground, feel pretty bad, lazy, whatever, that maybe, just maybe, by working together, it could have been prevented? Of course, we are trying not to wait for the advantage of hindsight. A lot of people (myself included) would rather do what can be done now, than kick myself in the butt later, that it could have been prevented, and I/other people did nothing.
It's a matter of perspective. Act now, when our actions are easier, or act later, when things will be much, much tougher. Which will you choose?

2007-05-16 05:19:57 · answer #4 · answered by shannon e 2 · 0 1

If the ice caps melt then the Eskimos will migrate down here and there goes the neighborhood.

P.S. The post after mine is from a Troll who cuts and pastes the same crap all over Yahoo Answers just to pizs people off.

2007-05-16 04:48:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

maintain and observe are what you are speaking of. All that ice melts and like that man said, we all die.
To think that humans can save an ice cap would almost be expecting humans to save a planet. Humans are incapable of population growing exponentially saving an entire planet is just too much to ask.

2007-05-16 04:51:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If polar ice melts, it will warm the Earth many degrees and sea levels will rise about 300 feet.
Goodbye all coastal settlements

2007-05-16 07:10:56 · answer #7 · answered by mar m 5 · 0 1

cause if they melt, the oceans will rise and then submerge some country's, or islands, or states.

personally, i think its a bunch of Bologna, and i live in California, but that's just me!

2007-05-16 04:45:38 · answer #8 · answered by Cara 4 · 0 0

Do you live near the coast? If not, then maybe it isn't that important to you, unless you'd like to be able to visit the Statue of Liberty some day. If you do live near the coast, maybe you had better start building your ark now, rather than waiting until the last minute.

2007-05-16 04:45:26 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0 4

Lots of reasons. Check this out.

http://www.scieds.com/saguaro/pdf/ewr_unit1_samp.pdf

2007-05-16 04:56:44 · answer #10 · answered by billiejoe4me 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers