English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here is the question I want to ask, " Should Mexico take over California since it's mostly inhabited by Mexican Nationals ?"

2007-05-16 02:46:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Languages

12 answers

¿Debería México tomar* California puesto que está principalmente habitada por mexicanos?

*Instead of "tomar" you can say "tomar el control de"

Hope that helps ;)

2007-05-16 03:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by chris_keever2000 7 · 6 2

¿Debe México tomar California debido a que está habitada mayoritariamente por ciudadanos mexicanos?

California used to be part of México but United States forced mexicans to give them those lands including Arizona, Nuevo México & Texas.

California always had influence from mexicans cuz they have always been there...but that's not a reason for Mexico to take over it. What i think is that spanish should be an official language in these states (if it isn't). Sorry for my english, i try to do my best.

2007-05-16 03:42:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that'll be:

¿Debería Mexico tomar California desde que está mayoritariamente habitada por Mexicanos nacionales?


let's have a look at the formation:

deberia = from the verb ( deber) in conditional

tomar= it also could be invadir, but it's more correct to say tomar.

desde= since

mayoritáriamente= most of the (-ly) endings in english, are finished with
(-mente) in spanish.

habitada= inhabited

other questions:

¿ Debe mexico tomar california desde que la invaden mayoritáriamente los mexicanos?

¿ No debería mexico invadir california desde que está mayormente habitada por mexicanos?

2007-05-16 03:34:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

¿Debería México gobernar California ya que está mayormente habitada por Mexicanos?

2007-05-16 07:34:46 · answer #4 · answered by Martha P 7 · 0 0

¿Debería México apoderarse de California, ya que está habitada mayormente por mexicanos?

2007-05-16 04:19:43 · answer #5 · answered by lost in space 6 · 1 0

Well, what do you mean by "take over". This will help in finding the precise translation. And those of you using inernet translations or other "gisted" translations of the sort, STOP. They are not correct and make the answer even more confused!!

2007-05-16 08:58:31 · answer #6 · answered by Jennifer 2 · 0 0

The correct translation is "¿Mexico deberia gobernar California dado que está habitada en mayoría por mexicanos?"

literally your phrase is "¿Mexico debe tomar el control sobre California dado que esta habitada en mayoría por mexicanos?" but 'tomar el control sobre' is used in case of war or something like that so 'gobernar' is more proper in this case

2007-05-16 04:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by esther c 4 · 0 2

Si México asumió el control California puesto que es habitada sobre todo por mexican Nationals?"

2007-05-16 03:02:07 · answer #8 · answered by Got ?'s 2 · 0 5

Debe Mexico conquistar a California, porque la mayoria del estado ya esta poblado por Mexicanos.

In my opinion, no, they shouldn't take it over.

We purchased the land after we won the war. If we are stupid enough to sell it back, and mexico has enough money to buy it, then so be it. (They will never have enough money or intelligence to take over any american state. They can't even take care of their own country).

2007-05-16 04:40:31 · answer #9 · answered by gg 7 · 0 3

Si México asumieron el control California puesto que es habitada sobre todo por mexican Nationals

2007-05-16 02:53:51 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0 6

fedest.com, questions and answers