wouldn't it mean that terrorists have won?
2007-05-16 01:41:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
First Paul D, i'm hunting you down on here. You are and idiot...Where do terrorists mostly live? Sweden? You should have died on 9/11/2001 with your fellow politically correct p*ssies. So anyone that attacks us or SUPPORTS people that attack us are OK?
For your question...Pull out and they will lie in wait. They would attack again.
How would lead there country? You have so many groups that want power...they cant get along since Jesus was around...they need strong leadership...savages!
I know your minds cant wrap around the idea oh what is really happening on the ground over there. We will be there along time.
2007-05-16 02:13:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Terrorists? Which terrorists? No, it would not mean that terrorists have won 'cos in the first place who are the terrorists u are fighting in Iraq? And yes, it is easier said than done not 4 d reasons u think but 'cos it is a situation where the occupiers are stuck and so staying has become hot & at d same time don't know how 2 start the "bring d troops home" even if they wanted to.
2007-05-16 09:18:47 · answer #2 · answered by aminu2763 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Think about it for a second. Iraq had nothing, zero, nadda to do with 9/11. Our troops are not being attacked by terrorists in Iraq, but are getting attacked by insurgents. That is a fancy word for locals that don't want us in their country.
The whitehouse LOVES calling anything they want to attack a terrorist.
In the end your statement is true because powerful people in Washington DC do not want to leave Iraq, they spent billions building PERMINATE bases there...to protect Bagdad ? Nah, the bases are positioned to protect the second largest oil field in the world..something a lot more important than Bagdad to our government.
Learn the truth, even if it hurts.
2007-05-16 08:51:21 · answer #3 · answered by Paul D 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
its easier said than done, but then, the way I see it, Iraq neds to govern and protect itself, the British and Ameican troops can't be in Iraq any longer. We've done all we can
2007-05-16 08:54:07 · answer #4 · answered by Motörhead Fan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
maybe try a different approach since troops are not winning there, bring them home and send all our social workers out in their place......
2007-05-16 08:51:09 · answer #5 · answered by tina k 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Bring the troops home" is newspeak for CUT AND RUN.
2007-05-16 08:44:32 · answer #6 · answered by BRICK 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-05-16 09:00:26 · answer #7 · answered by boden21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-05-16 08:48:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋