Where are your facts? Here is mine.
There is a God. Like it or hate it.
The most accurate of proofs in science are observable proofs. When an apple fell in his garden, Sir Isaac Newton concluded that there was some force that brought it down. Thus, the concept of gravity was born. When Galileo saw that the sun was not rotating around the earth through his telescopic sightings, he realized that the earth was rotating around the sun. And, of course, our recent voyages to the moon affirmed the truth of his and subsequent observations... Can the existence of God be proven in such a clear and obvious manner? Is there really a God? Or is mankind to continue questioning the existence of God and, as in the case of World relations, be polarized by the atheistic-theistic dichotomy? The latter is a question. However, the former can be scientifically proved in this statement with its accompanied diagram "Natures of Energies" God does exist!
2007-05-15
16:24:57
·
30 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
we do suffer. But these "facts of life" are the very proof of the existence of God!
THE LAW OF OPPOSITES
It is observable that everything we know of has an opposite. Where there is black, there is white. Where there is dry. there is wet. Where there is up, there is down. Where there is land, there is sea. Where there is night, there is day. Where there is atmosphere, there is no atmosphere (outer space.) Where there is wrong, there is right, etc. Therefore, when we can see no evidence of God, in the "Law of Opposities," there must be a God! A fish in the ocean doesn't see the sky, but there is one
NATURE OF ENERGIES
In my diagram entitles, "Nature of Energies," I depict in scientific terms what the Bible depicts in Genesis:
2007-05-15
16:25:23 ·
update #1
"Therefore, the Lord God sent him forth from the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:23.)" What is being said in Genesis is clear: mankind was cast from Paradise into an exsistence where he would suffer and die: "For dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return (Gen. 3:19.)" In the "Nature of Energies" I depict mankind in a negative energy field. Mankind, at present, moving toward death and destruction; toward war. Ironically, the very equation that can destroy mankind can save it: E=mc squared. The violent, primordial energies that were out beginning (Big Bang) have translated themselves through energy and mass (which is a form of energy) to our present time period. Mankind makes Tyrannosaurus Rex look tame. We can now annihilate our planet through war (or even through geological abuse.)
2007-05-15
16:26:03 ·
update #2
We are in what I call a negative energy field. And in this negative field; Satanic if you wish, we are in the same position as the fish in the water: we can not see God though God is there; just as there is a sky above an ocean. To actually "see" god, we must move into the positive zone; rechannel the primitive negative energies of our violent primordial past in the same way we channel wind into another direction. To survive, we must create love through positive communication (i.e., communication that leads to positive results): to create peace is the "Choice of Mankind." God is real just as oxygen is real though we cannot see it in the air
2007-05-15
16:26:49 ·
update #3
The lack of our awareness of the reality of God is the proof of His existence. The fact that we have athesists who say there is no God is the proof that there is a God. The fact that there is a negative means there is a positive. Polarity is the basis for science: in electricity; in magnetism; even in atomic structure. Where there is a negative, there is a positive. It may take a logic leap to see it. We must climb out of this ocean of negativity to see Him: for He exists in the positive field: the field of love, "God is love" (1 John 4:16.) Where there is deception, there is truth. Where there is darkness, there is light. God does exist! We just need the right glasses to see Him.
2007-05-15
16:27:18 ·
update #4
The lack of our awareness of the reality of God is the proof of His existence. The fact that we have athesists who say there is no God is the proof that there is a God. The fact that there is a negative means there is a positive. Polarity is the basis for science: in electricity; in magnetism; even in atomic structure. Where there is a negative, there is a positive. It may take a logic leap to see it. We must climb out of this ocean of negativity to see Him: for He exists in the positive field: the field of love, "God is love" (1 John 4:16.) Where there is deception, there is truth. Where there is darkness, there is light. God does exist! We just need the right glasses to see Him.
What do you have to say?
2007-05-15
16:27:41 ·
update #5
hey just want you to know that I'm on your side... the side of God. but you should have known you were stepping into a pit of vipers with an argument like this.... good luck, better you than me.
2007-05-15 16:40:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by bugboobunz 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
You say you have some facts, then throw a baseless opinion at us. Again, if there is a God, where is He? Where is there any proof whatsoever of Him? It's not in Bible scripture. The bible contradicts itself numerous times, which is something the truth can never do. Scientific findings have contradicted the Bible as well. Ergo, the Bible is not truth.
The Earth does indeed revolve around the sun. Am I to draw, based off of your confusing and rambling statements, that this proves the existance of God? Try again: The Earth revolving around the sun is indeed proveable... yet nowhere in that conception is the mention of God. At least, until you put it there. The rest of the babble? ...Um...
Based off of your previous posts, you're going to continue to beleive whatever you want to beleive--that's why it's called faith. But please stop pretending to understand the concept of principled thinking. It excapes you.
2007-05-17 03:59:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by writersblock73 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good with the facts, but I can tell you on R&S, save your breath. You could be Jesus come in the flesh amongst the many on here raising the death, healing the sick, and feeding the hungry and all they would do to you is crucify you. Mankind hasn't EVOLVE yet to the point of intelligent reasoning so why bother with the long speeches. When you can get an ape to make you breakfast would be a more rewarding endeavor......and simplicity on here accomplishes more results than writing a book......
2007-05-15 23:41:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Theban 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well yippy for you! Even if there is a god I want no part of everlasting life or any part of God who creates a world so messed up. I'll take the coffin when I die and let that be my final resting spot---no more games
2007-05-15 23:43:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jesse B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even if what you said "prooves" the existence of a god, what makes it the God you believe in. There may be a God, but who says it's not one of the Gods of the ancient religions? You can prove that there is a God a lot easier than you can proove that that God is the same one you worship.
2007-05-15 23:30:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Her 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
HHHMMmmmm, I see a logic problem here. If there is no proof of god, the opposite of that would be "there is no proof of the devil", not proof that there is a god.
I actually believe their is a god, but I refuse to follow the god of your bible, a true god would not have to resort to killing, murdering and taking children to the city gates to be stoned to death.
2007-05-15 23:34:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by toxicbutterfly13 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
You really need to get out more, you know that, don't you?
Out and talk to real people, not just the voices in your head.
Nothing you said proves anything except that you know nothing about the ways of scientific theory. And youse guys wonder why so many Americans are rising up to wrest our Constitution out of religion's shredding clutches.
B
2007-05-15 23:33:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by beatriceorme 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
That doesn't make much sense, brother.
What's the opposite of brown? There isn't one. We choose the colors black and white to represent specific situations. It's not universally applicable.
What's the opposite of your eye? The concept doesn't even make sense, unless you simply draw on the blank concept of being/not being and apply it to everything so that it fits your paradigm.
It's a nice, comforting thought you have, but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
2007-05-15 23:32:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I say, thank you for amusing me with a bunch of poppycock. Nothing about what you said is proof of god. Nor is it scientific or logical.
2007-05-16 01:01:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
~Therefore, when we can see no evidence of the Tooth Fairy, in the "Law of Opposities," there must be a Tooth Fairy!~
Congratulations, you've just "proved" the existence of the Tooth Fairy.
I could respond the the astounding logical faults (and still, lack of any credible evidence) in the next section...but why bother? I'm tired.
2007-05-15 23:31:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by N 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
http://www.godisimaginary.com
I don't have time to educate you. But this site might help.
(Though you mentioned a funny idiotic argument that seems popular with your ilk. Since I deny that there is a god, I therefore believe in one? I've never understood how warped minds like yours can make sense of that. Let me make you think for a moment... By your logic, you are saying that by denying the existence of Santa Claus... Santa Claus is therefore real? I know you're a lost cause, and won't understand this, but maybe someone else will learn from it. )
2007-05-15 23:27:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋