Well, my group got a debate to do (we're AGAINST the moot, btw). But being AGAINST such a moot is rather difficult and we have a VERY limited time. So, um, any suggestions? 'Twould be much obliged... ;-)
2007-05-15 14:19:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
N/B: This is for an English class
2007-05-15 14:33:13 · update #1
Women have historically ruled countries. Just not this one. I think you could focus your debate if you focus on the constitution and the majority vote. It should not focus on factors such as gender, race, etc. It should focus on who is most qualified and who is truly elected by the majority vote. If it is broader than just the US then frame the debate around the qualifying factors of WHO should lead.... education, residency, etc.
2007-05-15 15:13:20 · answer #1 · answered by K. Van 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Women absolutely should not be allowed to rule a country. Every 28 days they go crazy (Bipolar Disorder), needing to be held, crying at the littlest things, beaming with pride because you said something nice, screaming @ the top of their lungs that you don't understand their needs, that you're a S.O.B., and on and on. Any form of dementia is undesirable in someone running a country.
2007-05-15 16:09:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes women have just as much of a right to govern our country as men do!
2007-05-15 14:26:47 · answer #3 · answered by Janet 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Women have no stability under pressure unlike men especially with regards to attitudes toward wars.
2007-05-15 21:08:23 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think yes. Just because women have not been given the opportunity does not mean that they would not be successful. I think that it is very egotistical of a man to think that only a man could do the job.
2007-05-15 14:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by Kate 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think anyone who is qualified should be allowed to govern a country, regardless or race, gender, etc.
2007-05-15 16:16:24 · answer #6 · answered by Robert L 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why not ? the prime minister of england was a women marget
tacher(i think i spelled het last name wrong) and the prime minister of isreal was a women . so why not .
2007-05-16 04:46:27 · answer #7 · answered by atlantismeditation@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am all for the RIGHT woman ruling.. but NOT just she is a woman. I will not be voting for Hilary... she is not the right woman for the job!
2007-05-15 18:23:24 · answer #8 · answered by kaisergirl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well its not like men are doing such a great job...
2007-05-15 14:25:03 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
true that....why not, i dont see a reason not to.....look at this way less work for us huh.....lol just joking
AirsoftDude
2007-05-15 14:27:25 · answer #10 · answered by AirsoftDude 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋