English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They refuse to rebuild in peace they kill and kill, it is an excercise in futility like trying to teach a rabid dog anything! Destroying the viper nest seems the only way to protect all the nations from this moving cancer stemming from Iraq and Iran.

2007-05-15 13:07:29 · 6 answers · asked by Faerie loue 5 in Politics & Government Military

6 answers

What you are suggesting is criminal and ignorant to the extreme.

If you were on the ground for just one day, I would take you on patrol out to my old sector. You can see the schoolkids wave at you. You can see the women do their laundry. You can see old men in dishashas sit down by the palm groves and sip tea.

You can see me talk and embrace my Peshmerga brothers. You can see us help rebuild roads, schools, and guard elections. You can even sit down to eat with us as we share a plate of chicken on rice with the locals, with plates of fruit and other things.

And you want to "bomb" this all, because you watch 1% of what is going on in the ground on CNN and get some stupid, crazy ideas of how the war should be run. Same with any of the idiots who answered above me who advocate wholesale death and desruction.

Excuse me while I NOT clap madly in support of your ideas or blatant display of ignorance by all of you.

2007-05-16 01:07:22 · answer #1 · answered by Nat 5 · 0 2

Neutron bomb. Move out all the civilians and disarm them. Build a 150 ft tall wall around Iraq that is 1000 ft deep. Disarm the nation neutron bomb the citys repopulate in 20 years. Send in supplys threw the air. let the rivers flow threw vents. The only way. It's called sterlization.

2007-05-15 20:10:25 · answer #2 · answered by massacre[[Screamer for T.D.A.]] 2 · 1 1

The USA believes there a mass destruction the Iraqi built. They can combed every cravies and holes in Iraq now without any protest from anyone. Find them and and use it to pay for their prize.

2007-05-15 20:17:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Things were far quieter before the invasion. You only have yourself to blame.

2007-05-16 00:45:36 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1 0

i say we give warning to a innocent civilians and then drop a huge huge bomb on the entire area
heres my 360 page
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-VEIz_d45fqdtKyTAwz0h0ztu1_JJ.hLW.A--;_ylt=ArKbIr1VLM4RgejxA5LVKLSsAOJ3?cq=1

2007-05-15 20:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 1 1

No warning is necessary during wartime.........

2007-05-15 20:10:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers