English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it because it would put accountants and tax services out of private business.

2007-05-15 03:54:53 · 3 answers · asked by World Peace Now 3 in Business & Finance Taxes United States

3 answers

10% wouldn't collect enough revenue and even a 10% flat tax would be very regressive.

When Steve Forbes was running for President he proposed a 17% flat tax. Economists looked at the plan they said that, in order to keep revenue at the current level, a flat tax would have to be at lease 21%. A 21% tax would be awesome if you are paying 35% but it would put millions of poor people out in the street.

For example a single parent with 2 kids and $20k in income would get about $3300 more back than they had withheld. An effective tax rate of negative 16.5%. With even a 10% flat tax, they would be $5300 worse off and, with the 21% flat tax, they would be $7500 worse off!

A flat tax would wonderfull for the upper middle class and the rich but would be devastating to the working poor.

2007-05-15 05:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by Wayne Z 7 · 1 0

It would also cause a large number of people that don't presently have much, if any tax, liability to pay 10% of their income toward income tax. Any body that I know of believes that it would take more like 15% to make up the lost revenue. It would greatly benefit the "rich" who now pay something like 35%.

2007-05-15 11:03:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

Also it would only provide less than half of what the current system provides, and would hit the poorest people the hardest.

2007-05-15 12:21:09 · answer #3 · answered by Judy 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers