The respective Political Action Committees they belong to.
2007-05-15 00:08:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Two notes:
First, the verse in Revelations was a standard copyright notice because things were handcopied at the time. It wasn't a statement from God, it was in the majority of books during the period. In fact, it was pleasant by comparison for some books.
Second, the passage in John 5:7 does not appear in any early manuscript. It is known as the Johanine comma. They did not declare trinity a falsehood, they fixed a copist's addition. Prior to the last century, copiests and translators felt free to add or subtract in order to make the meaning clear. We currently have 400,000 variant passages in the New Testament, with no mechanism to know with certainty, which passages are original. The same problem exists in the Koran, though it isn't as well talked about. The current version of the Koran does not match the older versions found by archaeologists implying it went through the same process as the bible of copying. This, of course, would make sense as both are very human books.
2007-05-15 00:19:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by OPM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The closest verse regarding "Trinity" in the Bible, has now been thrown out of the Bible
The verse in the Bible which is closest to "Trinity" and is often quoted by Christian missionaries is the first Epistle of John, chapter 5 verse no 7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost; and these three are one."
In the Revised Standard Version of the Bible (R.S.V.) revised by 32 Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by 50 different co-operating denominations, this verse which is the keystone of the Christian faith has been removed as an interpolation, as a fabrication and as a concoction. It has not been expunged from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible by the Muslims or by non-Christian scholars, but by 32 Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by 50 different cooperating denominations as an interpolation, as a concoction and as a fabrication because this verse does not exist in the original manuscript. We Muslims must congratulate the galaxy of D.D.’s (Doctors of Divinity) who have been honest enough to eliminate another lie from the English R.S.V. Bible, thus bringing it closer to the teachings of Islam and the Glorious Qur’an.
The Biblical Scholars have reversed their system while translating the verse of II Corinthians chapter 4 verse 4
"(And the devil is) the god of this world". [II Corinthians 4:4]
Here, "Hotheos" has been wrongly translated as "the god", instead of "the God".
In Exodus Chapter 7 verse 1
"And the Lord said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh".[Exodus 7:1]
Why is a small ‘g’ used here for God instead of Capital ‘G’?
2007-05-15 00:26:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Friend, I don't see anything in this verse pertaining to a trinity, We can not add nor remove God's word, We have to see the revelation of he word, without any revelations, there is no understanding. But to be honest, there is not 3 Gods, Or 3 Persons There is oNLY One God & God is a spirit so you can not make God or the Holy Ghost a person, They are the same spirit of God.
2007-05-15 00:21:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What Bishops ? When ?
There are many sects & cults that have altered words & phrases in the Bible to suit their own agenda....that's why they are cults .
Just an example ...the Jehovah's Witnesses...they have manipulated the Word of God to suit their own delusional view of " Christianity " & in so doing are being led down the path of destruction !
Then there's the Mormans ...they'll peddle their book of Morman before getting into any discussion regarding the Word of God , The Bible !
2007-05-15 00:19:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
in reality the Father Son and Spirit is named in every possible order in various verses of the New Testament, usually more than once each
and there are singular cases where Father Son and Spirit share the same "name" and "throne"
so in the end the Trinity would hardly rest on only one verse
Jesus prayed to God, calling God 'Father' every time He prayed excepting once... seems to be rather ignored by Muslims
2007-05-15 00:10:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ask the mormons and the Jehovah Witnesses, they have removed, added or alter the to their own version of their KJV bible.
2007-05-15 00:25:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL
You my friend are a Muslim
So tell me
Who In fact Deleted Verses from the Bible AND Who took the stance of JESUS and made Him just a Prophet?
2007-05-15 00:11:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Obviously we must be allowed because a precedent was set on the matter. Council of Nicaea 325 AD.
2007-05-15 00:11:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Can you tell me in which language did the Christians add or delete a bible??"
Passages were removed and added, wording subtly changed both accidentally and on purpose, more than you might think.
King James was famous for this...
2007-05-15 00:12:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by li.mony 3
·
1⤊
1⤋