English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who are the prophets of the Southern Kingdom?

2007-05-14 17:11:10 · 6 answers · asked by Elizabeth 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

Why is that a Catholic question?? Isaiah and Micah prophesied to the Southern kingdom of Judah, Amos, though a native of the Southern Kingdom, prophesied to the Northern Kingdom, along with Hosea.

2007-05-14 17:16:26 · answer #1 · answered by keri gee 6 · 1 0

The Prophets of the Southern Kingdom are:

Prophet - Biblical Reference
Azariah - 2Chr 15:1,8
Daniel - Daniel
Eliezer - 2Chr 20:37
Elijah - 2Chr 21:12-15
Ezekiel - Ezekiel
Habakkuk - Habakkuk
Hanani - 2Chr 16:7-10
Huldah the Prophetess - 2Kin 22:14-20; 2Chr 34:22-28
Iddo the Seer - 2Chr 12:15; 2Chr 13:22;
Isaiah - Isaiah
Jahaziel - 2Chr 20:14-17
Jehu, son of Hanani - 2Chr 19:2,3
Jeremiah - Jeremiah
Joel - Joel
Micah - Micah
Nahum - Nahum
Obadiah - Obadiah
Shemaiah - 2Chr 11:2-4; 12:5-7,15
Unnamed Prophets - 2Chr 25:7-9,15,16; 2Kin 21:10; 2Chr 33:18;
Urijah son of Shemaiah - Jer 26:20
Zechariah - 2Chr 26:5n 21:10.
Zephaniah - Zephaniah

With love in Christ.

2007-05-14 17:46:47 · answer #2 · answered by imacatholic2 7 · 2 0

Following the death of Solomon, the kingdom of Isreal divided into two kingdoms, north and south. Micah was from the South and is therefore considered a prophet of the southern kingdom. But this is not really just a Catholic Question, but Judeo/Christian

2007-05-14 17:21:36 · answer #3 · answered by Poetland 6 · 1 0

In the most simplest of terms the Catholic/Orthodox Churches are the oldest they have the oldest culture, practices and beliefs. Both of their history's can be traced back to the time of Christ. Both have theology's consistent with and based on the Early Church Fathers. Both were involved with deciding what "books" would be in the bible and both Pre-existed the Bible. Both were one Church and split in 1054. Both have almost identical beliefs. The Protestant Churches were started in the 16th century. Their beliefs evolved over time in the last 5 centuries there has been explosive growth in the doctrines and theology in the last 150 years adding more new beliefs that were never held by Christians in the first 1500 years. Ultimately you will need to decide for yourself which is more likely to be following the original teachings of Jesus or which is more apostolic. I would recommend you read the Early Church Fathers. There is a book by a member of a Protestant church that is trying some what to try to follow the early Church and the early councils. It is called the "Dictionary of Early Christian beliefs". It is available at B&N for $19.95. Since it is not Catholic or Orthodox it will be neutral to Catholic/Orthodox doctrine. You can use that as a start. You are also welcome to contact me for additional resources. May you find a closer relationship with Jesus through journey. I am Catholic. BTW The JW's posted on their web site that they were not Christians in 1997 some time later they claimed again that they were Christians. They do not believe in the Divinity of Jesus or the Trinity. They do not believe that Jesus was Crucified. They do not follow the baptism instructions in the bible or the early Church. Because of these differences they cannot be called Christians.

2016-04-01 01:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe the Pope
jtm

2007-05-14 17:15:00 · answer #5 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0 2

Fred. mick the Mullet, Seymore beaver and long DONG John.

2007-05-14 17:13:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers